{
  "docId": "019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd",
  "docSlug": "64ba5cf989a0cf767f243c357144339d",
  "documentTitle": "TD Securities | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides",
  "authorId": "td-securities",
  "authorName": "TD Securities",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2022-06-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 33,
  "pageCount": 40,
  "prevPage": 32,
  "nextPage": 34,
  "slideType": "sensitivity_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 150,
  "notes": "Includes two tables: a metal price sensitivity matrix and a tornado-style sensitivity chart.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd/33",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd#slide-33",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.45,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Sensitivity Analysis (Tornado Chart)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "661999d8-f2ef-41d1-99f0-7aa9340bc502",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.8,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "DRAFT as of 27-Jun-2022 Strictly Confidential For Discussion Purposes Only",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8ae89ccb-259c-4a2b-836b-70f310666cc8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Company management. Note: Values shown in US$mm on attributable basis at a 10% discount rate.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cdf7b346-0424-43e4-a713-0feb80454262",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Metal Price Sensitivity Analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "26d8b8a2-2832-4e3f-bfaa-a373f7e6fa86",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "General Sensitivity Analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b3491e58-4dc5-4f6c-b0ba-4e145e79219c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4a2d-7357-ac09-7db0d559c56e",
      "evidence": "Heat colour or directional shading used across NPV sensitivity grid.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4a0a-76bb-b2b9-34cdaafbe3b8",
      "evidence": "Metal-price matrix paired with tornado-style sensitivity bars.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "8194661c-559c-4016-b760-d880646a0c73",
      "evidence": "Sensitivity Analysis (Tornado Chart)",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Scenario Analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019debe5-4cc7-76f5-bf73-4aa33010571f",
      "evidence": "Metal-price/discount-rate sensitivity matrix paired with tornado chart.",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 22,
      "beatId": "019debe5-407d-7129-a12c-0f1933021ead",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Modelling Parameters divider through model review, NPV bridge, sensitivities.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019debe5-410f-70ef-8df5-c8fdb4d7b629",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Methodology and model establish what the discount/asset is worth.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 58,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 30,
      "name": "Sensitivity Test",
      "slug": "52-sensitivity-test",
      "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4235-776a-b4ad-927e62cdf0a1",
      "evidence": "Upside/downside scenario tables, illustrative NPV waterfall, and metal-price/discount-rate sensitivity tables and tornado.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Stress-test the NPV against upside/downside scenarios and macro assumptions",
      "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion",
      "confidence": 90,
      "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}