{
  "docId": "019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd",
  "docSlug": "64ba5cf989a0cf767f243c357144339d",
  "documentTitle": "TD Securities | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides",
  "authorId": "td-securities",
  "authorName": "TD Securities",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2022-06-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 32,
  "pageCount": 40,
  "prevPage": 31,
  "nextPage": 33,
  "slideType": "sensitivity_analysis",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cumulative or individual impacts on NPV.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd/32",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd#slide-32",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.32,
        "x": 0.23,
        "y": 0.265
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "At $4.00/lb and $4.50/lb LT Cu the illustrative NPV impact rises to $499mm and $545mm, respectively",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5385218b-223e-46b1-b976-5497b7b4893c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Illustrative NPV Impact (Attributable Basis – 10% Discount Rate)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "39d872d0-ad42-47c9-b1d3-3bbb9f4ded3a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.87
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Company management. Values shown in US$mm on attributable basis at a 10% discount rate.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "720d1c9f-ed8f-46a2-b33a-8d80dc2c90b8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Scenario Specific Sensitivity Analysis | Illustrative NPV Impact",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "add54b44-ad18-4168-82ef-d68b5d649df0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-49c2-71e7-aaf8-a16408999def",
      "evidence": "Dashed callouts state '$499mm and $545mm' impacts at higher Cu prices.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-499d-76c9-882f-1825d3ae9c63",
      "evidence": "Green up-bars left of zero, red down-bars right, separated as Upsides/Downsides.",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-49e5-701c-aa0c-478fafbe3e78",
      "evidence": "Single waterfall ranks scenarios largest-upside to largest-downside.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f722bc43-f407-4ee0-add4-31535ca75382",
      "evidence": "chart/waterfall: Illustrative NPV Impact (Attributable Basis – 10% Discount Rate)",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019debe5-4ca2-7209-959d-a6c5596f6786",
      "evidence": "Illustrative NPV impact split into upside/downside bars.",
      "confidence": 88
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 22,
      "beatId": "019debe5-407d-7129-a12c-0f1933021ead",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Modelling Parameters divider through model review, NPV bridge, sensitivities.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019debe5-410f-70ef-8df5-c8fdb4d7b629",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Methodology and model establish what the discount/asset is worth.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 58,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 30,
      "name": "Sensitivity Test",
      "slug": "52-sensitivity-test",
      "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4235-776a-b4ad-927e62cdf0a1",
      "evidence": "Upside/downside scenario tables, illustrative NPV waterfall, and metal-price/discount-rate sensitivity tables and tornado.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Stress-test the NPV against upside/downside scenarios and macro assumptions",
      "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion",
      "confidence": 90,
      "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}