{
  "docId": "019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd",
  "docSlug": "64ba5cf989a0cf767f243c357144339d",
  "documentTitle": "TD Securities | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides",
  "authorId": "td-securities",
  "authorName": "TD Securities",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2022-06-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 31,
  "pageCount": 40,
  "prevPage": 30,
  "nextPage": 32,
  "slideType": "sensitivity_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": "The slide lists six specific downside risks: Delay to Panels 1 & 2, Pillar Grade Recoveries, Debottlenecking Capex, Block Caving Risk, Interim Power Cost Escalation, and Entrée Tax Arbitration.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd/31",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-0e3e-718f-a619-12ed5a3bf0bd#slide-31",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In addition to model adjustments reviewed in previous section, other downsides specific to OT have been reviewed but not included in the Adjusted Resource Case given level of uncertainty",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "60c6df86-6890-40c8-b4ec-2d737257eb88",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Company management",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d2c69234-8831-4869-afde-de16185f0619",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Model Sensitivities table with columns: Downsides, Key Assumptions, Reference Source",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3fe3033c-6eb8-4317-89d6-7caf7508b413",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Scenario Specific Sensitivity Analysis | Downsides",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9773ab47-d0fa-48cb-a6bf-cdf57afa6d0b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Scenario planning",
      "slug": "scenario-planning",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "51a9a8f0-3f22-40c2-b288-efb68a950623",
      "evidence": "keyword-coverage: scenario, uncertainty",
      "confidence": 0.2
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4979-7019-80aa-2be3c5a68370",
      "evidence": "Downside table designed to mirror upside table on p30.",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4954-7782-9050-5a43a0ffdbc7",
      "evidence": "Six-row downside risks table mirroring p30 layout.",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 22,
      "beatId": "019debe5-407d-7129-a12c-0f1933021ead",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Modelling Parameters divider through model review, NPV bridge, sensitivities.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019debe5-410f-70ef-8df5-c8fdb4d7b629",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Methodology and model establish what the discount/asset is worth.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 58,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 30,
      "name": "Sensitivity Test",
      "slug": "52-sensitivity-test",
      "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment",
      "matchId": "019debe5-4235-776a-b4ad-927e62cdf0a1",
      "evidence": "Upside/downside scenario tables, illustrative NPV waterfall, and metal-price/discount-rate sensitivity tables and tornado.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Stress-test the NPV against upside/downside scenarios and macro assumptions",
      "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion",
      "confidence": 90,
      "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}