{
  "docId": "019de072-ceb8-76ba-9e40-15e4b4b706f6",
  "docSlug": "fb30f9c415b405227d7d49d3464be384",
  "documentTitle": "Old Second Bancorp | Shareholder Engagement Presentation Deck | 30 slides",
  "authorId": "old-second-bancorp",
  "authorName": "Old Second Bancorp",
  "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
  "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2022-05-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.2938006,
  "pageNumber": 17,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 16,
  "nextPage": 18,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 9,
  "notes": "Uses bar charts to show relative positioning of the pro forma entity against industry medians.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de072-ceb8-76ba-9e40-15e4b4b706f6/17",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de072-ceb8-76ba-9e40-15e4b4b706f6",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de072-ceb8-76ba-9e40-15e4b4b706f6.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de072-ceb8-76ba-9e40-15e4b4b706f6#slide-17",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.18,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Cost of Deposits comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "308737e6-dbc0-4d8e-ac1c-5e6a3b342c0a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.18,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Deposit Beta During Rising Rates comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "51532915-d681-42e4-bdb5-52dc2bbca6bf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.18,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Retail Deposit % comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c373c7f1-51c8-498f-ade0-b05a9d71a376",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Deposit data per company filings and as of the quarter ended June 30, 2021, or most recent available. (1) Reflects publicly traded banks. (2) Reflects median of Chicago-based banks with over $250mm in assets. (3) Reflects change in deposit costs relative to Fed Funds rate increase from Q3'15 to Q2'19.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1aa52dac-3773-4151-b395-9231f8e47b69",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.68,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Best-in-class deposit base, 95% core deposit funding, High retail deposit concentration, Substantial excess liquidity, Well positioned for rising rate environment",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d10656af-9726-43e6-9057-e106ba38975d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Attractive, Low Cost Pro Forma Deposit Base",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0e3f80e0-1d3d-49d0-934e-50e009302948",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "dd5e42f5-9fe0-406b-8825-f999d3df7800",
      "evidence": "Compares pro forma entity against peer medians across three key metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "930567a7-d608-4375-a5dc-ca9206926935",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Evidence",
      "beatSlug": "evidence",
      "evidence": "Financial highlights and performance metrics",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 16,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "11c49de2-599d-4746-9e29-4a9bfdc5c161",
      "evidence": "Comparison table and peer benchmark",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight attractive deposit base",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}