{
  "docId": "019de072-551c-72cd-ae06-8f75677b9df8",
  "docSlug": "1eaef4fa5987fbc8d9c557d2b0feb76e",
  "documentTitle": "DraftKings | Investor Day Presentation Deck | 50 slides",
  "authorId": "draftkings",
  "authorName": "DraftKings",
  "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
  "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2022-03-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 50,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 16,
  "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to demonstrate that other states (PA, MI) are outperforming the NJ 2019 benchmark, suggesting that projections based on NJ are conservative.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de072-551c-72cd-ae06-8f75677b9df8/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de072-551c-72cd-ae06-8f75677b9df8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de072-551c-72cd-ae06-8f75677b9df8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de072-551c-72cd-ae06-8f75677b9df8#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "iGaming Gross Revenue Per Adult - 2021 State Performance Benchmarked to NJ in 2019",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "78ef0835-5bcb-4a54-b557-d7025d532cd0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "We benchmarked Gross Revenue per adult in 2021 to the first calendar year in NJ after both OSB and iGaming launched (2019). Methodology sets a conservatively high benchmark with NJ 2019...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0827ac3e-a894-46c3-8b5b-9cd2b6fc4b3f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: State Gaming Data; U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "287a9f77-6829-475e-b66f-891bc2cc0ecd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.66
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Gross Revenue / Adult as % of NJ, NJ Adj. Gross Revenue / Adult, Adj. Gross Revenue / Adult as % of NJ",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1a5394ef-35cc-41ec-ac3e-f4a5c25a1fda",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Extrapolating from NJ is likely conservative given PA and MI's iGaming performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9c0edb39-9924-4e11-aba0-9e03a229caff",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d0705f39-ff79-4b0a-8c07-0a575bb80e9b",
      "evidence": "Benchmarking state performance against NJ 2019 to establish a conservative baseline.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "766a2d2a-05e6-4759-9340-ced6bb54ba8b",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Market Size",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size",
      "evidence": "The presentation deck provides detailed information on the market size and growth potential of the online sports betting and iGaming market.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Zoom In",
      "slug": "06-zoom-in",
      "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
      "matchId": "7b0b5014-60ca-4bca-a4e1-f9a48e979b7e",
      "evidence": "The presentation deck provides a detailed analysis of the market size and growth potential of the online sports betting and iGaming market.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To provide a detailed analysis of the market size and growth potential",
      "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}