{
  "docId": "019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820",
  "docSlug": "72a042aa3735f7947a8a428a7ec3d869",
  "documentTitle": "Evotec | ESG Presentation Deck | 43 slides",
  "authorId": "evotec",
  "authorName": "Evotec",
  "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
  "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2022-02-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 26,
  "pageCount": 43,
  "prevPage": 25,
  "nextPage": 27,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a table format to contrast specific components of remuneration (structure, STI, LTI, SOG & CIC).",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820/26",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820#slide-26",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of existing vs new remuneration frameworks across four categories.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "28f2a6b5-ae70-45ef-a693-9eca24d9186c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Comparison of the new and the existing remuneration framework",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "13ca04d9-d486-4450-8a16-95dfc5b4aea9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "New remuneration framework for Management Board addresses key investor concerns",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e67b28f6-2c1b-4a87-ae70-cdba8eb13a11",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "bb073c67-b5f2-4ee8-99e1-e379d21d686f",
      "evidence": "Comparison table of existing vs new remuneration frameworks across four categories.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "cb2f4cbf-f086-46ae-becd-68c390d87d96",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side comparison of existing and new remuneration frameworks.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "c262f2e0-b190-4f10-9d92-24dc78ebc16d",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a clear and structured approach to ESG factors integration.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To present a logical approach to sustainability and corporate governance",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}