{
  "docId": "019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820",
  "docSlug": "72a042aa3735f7947a8a428a7ec3d869",
  "documentTitle": "Evotec | ESG Presentation Deck | 43 slides",
  "authorId": "evotec",
  "authorName": "Evotec",
  "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
  "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2022-02-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 23,
  "pageCount": 43,
  "prevPage": 22,
  "nextPage": 24,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table structure to contrast the two peer groups based on rationale and composition.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820/23",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de072-29dc-707e-94be-61c1b2437820#slide-23",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.785
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "MDAX as lead comparator does not reflect industry focus & international perspective, thus an additional competitor peer group has been defined",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b2f53f16-f0d9-4d7c-951e-31d8d6ac31f1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "To assess Evotec's alignment to relevant market practices regarding the design of the remuneration framework as well as the level of remuneration, the Supervisory Board has defined two comparator peer groups to account for two main considerations. In line with German regulatory requirements, there are three appropriateness criteria to be considered for the definition of peer group: Country, industry and size",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07570fea-fba7-4c3f-b24b-0218f963a8ca",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Peer group 1: MDAX vs Peer group 2: US / International competitors",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f3946153-e8cb-4cf6-a03b-d0025713e910",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Two peer groups considered to reflect Evotec's international footprint and NASDAQ listing",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "971bfc42-61cf-40a4-9e9d-676288dec521",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Rationale of the peer group development",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "05cde5a0-1143-4075-8b17-e6fba2c45cc1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8643633e-73e3-46a7-8720-336d5479d0f8",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a side-by-side comparison table to evaluate two different peer group strategies.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "c262f2e0-b190-4f10-9d92-24dc78ebc16d",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a clear and structured approach to ESG factors integration.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To present a logical approach to sustainability and corporate governance",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}