{
  "docId": "019de070-b1a7-70ff-84d5-ceb6162011b7",
  "docSlug": "b4988e515c3a1bcfa8175b1725141d1f",
  "documentTitle": "Elms | SPAC Presentation Deck | 46 slides",
  "authorId": "elms",
  "authorName": "Electric Last Mile Solutions",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2021-02-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 40,
  "pageCount": 46,
  "prevPage": 39,
  "nextPage": 41,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The slide uses a visual comparison between a fixed transaction value ($1.2B) and a range of peer-derived enterprise values ($2.3B-$3.7B).",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de070-b1a7-70ff-84d5-ceb6162011b7/40",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de070-b1a7-70ff-84d5-ceb6162011b7",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de070-b1a7-70ff-84d5-ceb6162011b7.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de070-b1a7-70ff-84d5-ceb6162011b7#slide-40",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Transaction Value vs Comparable Valuation Sensitivity Analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4648d63d-628d-4d6a-8075-552f1d48189e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "(1) EBITDA and EBITDA margin are non-GAAP metrics and based on current management estimates and current budget model.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8f82bb4e-f857-4229-8970-dd6fa5ec3ca9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "ELMS Estimated Valuation Provides Opportunistic Entry Point At A Discount Relative To Peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "095e649a-e51d-4a41-9303-ef21d350c039",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Enterprise Value Sensitivity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4444c48a-1ce3-42a1-9876-2de4dd8fcbc1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "a12a334d-c5e7-4352-b1ad-45b87dcda335",
      "evidence": "Comparing internal transaction value against external peer valuation ranges",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 36,
      "beatId": "a28c04a4-d7d9-44b4-b463-8fc1c4a7af23",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Financials",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-financials",
      "evidence": "The deck presents financial information on pages 36-40",
      "position": 5,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 36,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "37349afc-e8ae-4b70-90a8-38fe8b947801",
      "evidence": "The deck presents financial performance comparisons on pages 36-40",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "How does ELMS' financial performance compare to peers?",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}