{
  "docId": "019de06f-fac0-7028-97e9-79b5a868635b",
  "docSlug": "a9dbd2afd8b67eb9b43951ae299ef9e4",
  "documentTitle": "Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 62 slides",
  "authorId": "pershing-square",
  "authorName": "Pershing Square Holdings",
  "documentKindSlug": "deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2020-02-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 33,
  "pageCount": 62,
  "prevPage": 32,
  "nextPage": 34,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to contrast revenue scale (2.1x) with profitability (930 bps gap).",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-fac0-7028-97e9-79b5a868635b/33",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-fac0-7028-97e9-79b5a868635b",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-fac0-7028-97e9-79b5a868635b.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-fac0-7028-97e9-79b5a868635b#slide-33",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Agilent’s margins are significantly below its closest peer, Waters, despite being more than twice its size",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b69bed06-d7cb-4fbd-a2c1-73d1ffc9b2c4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.54,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "EBITDA Margin comparison between Waters (34.8%) and Agilent (25.5%)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "15d7777d-c3bf-4ad4-9557-d6cbe6d9fa47",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Revenue comparison between Waters ($2.4bn) and Agilent ($5.2bn)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f04c3fb3-1384-4464-a8ee-41850a1fd9e8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: Figures above reflect LTM financials. LTM financials are as of fiscal year 2019 for Agilent and fiscal Q4 2018 through Q3 2019 for Waters. Source: Company filings",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e70fc5e5-878a-4a81-9896-61b99db57145",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Large Margin Gap Relative to Closest Peer",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d9d42e67-d14e-4ebf-b22e-c73a4d12fb20",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "4cdb6092-9dc5-443d-a272-5093802783aa",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-vertical: EBITDA Margin comparison between Waters (34.8%) and Agilent (25.5%)",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "ef4917d5-4f14-432f-9db1-8191b28139fc",
      "evidence": "Direct side-by-side comparison of two companies across two key metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 49,
      "from": 31,
      "beatId": "4844ba62-45b2-49cd-81b4-4377d9c5ba3b",
      "arcName": "The Sparkline",
      "arcSlug": "sparkline",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "The portfolio update section, with its focus on specific investments and their performance, represents a climax in the narrative.",
      "position": 5,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 39,
      "from": 30,
      "name": "Day In Life",
      "slug": "14-day-in-life",
      "bestFor": "Product demos, UX reviews, investor pitches focusing on pain points",
      "matchId": "7b771a39-8d66-4ca4-ab90-d5ead373e695",
      "evidence": "The detailed investment thesis and performance metrics for Agilent, BRK, CMG, and other portfolio companies.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To show the day-in-life and growth potential of portfolio companies",
      "structure": "The User's Struggle -> The Intervention (Your Solution) -> The Resolved State",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Humanize abstract data by walking through a single user's struggle and resolution"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}