{
  "docId": "019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de",
  "docSlug": "9eb540a80b476a79f2062794a830c22a",
  "documentTitle": "Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 11 slides",
  "authorId": "goldman-sachs",
  "authorName": "Goldman Sachs",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-08-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 11,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 48,
  "notes": "The slide presents a valuation and yield analysis for Arkose, comparing current market data with indexed data from January 26th.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Arkose Projections and Bloomberg market data as of 24-Aug-2018. Note: Share counts based on 2Q2018 Midstream and GP 10-Qs.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "350b1e5e-0d53-4fb1-b9fa-a5ae074718d1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Calculation of Combined Equity Value and Calculation of Yield tables showing units, prices, equity values, and implied yields for 2019 and 2020.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ebb2ea3e-c687-4e25-ac1c-c62663d38305",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Determining Arkose's Overall Status Quo Yield",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c2a60380-3a6b-4a16-961e-1eb18d0a9a25",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Table data",
      "slug": "table-data",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6948326e-5658-4d21-af3c-0cf37a93583d",
      "evidence": "Calculation of Combined Equity Value and Calculation of Yield tables showing units, prices, equity values, and implied yields for 2019 and 2020.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "8d4c9549-f1c8-4586-be19-0f05032352ff",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The slides on determining overall status quo yield and value distribution provide evidence.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "c1d61a43-3f21-4395-b94c-72c082d2ed2c",
      "evidence": "The various financial analysis and comparison slides contribute to a comprehensive evaluation.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "to evaluate alternatives for bridging the value gap",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    },
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 1,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "8e734319-dd0e-4685-b4ad-a85afe72d8d8",
      "evidence": "The overall narrative emphasizes the need to resolve the value gap issue.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "to highlight the importance of addressing the value gap",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}