{
  "docId": "019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de",
  "docSlug": "9eb540a80b476a79f2062794a830c22a",
  "documentTitle": "Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 11 slides",
  "authorId": "goldman-sachs",
  "authorName": "Goldman Sachs",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-08-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 3,
  "pageCount": 11,
  "prevPage": 2,
  "nextPage": 4,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The table uses checkmarks, question marks, and an 'X' to indicate status alignment across four columns.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de/3",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-ade0-765b-9002-1b67562198de#slide-3",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.29,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "PRELIMINARY CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9cf5544b-91c1-4649-b72e-8b4f84d81da5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.68,
        "w": 0.74,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.215
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of transaction components vs entities",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "304c107d-61ee-422f-99f4-924f5bd70bce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Status of Key Transaction Components",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2a4031dc-8c66-4629-b561-f31d8f895f7c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3668cb8b-01dc-43e5-87ff-70da70d548c6",
      "evidence": "table/data: Comparison matrix of transaction components vs entities",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 4,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "def81b17-3950-4ab3-9ce5-6ece62367f25",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The comparison table and financial analysis slides highlight the key issues.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "c1d61a43-3f21-4395-b94c-72c082d2ed2c",
      "evidence": "The various financial analysis and comparison slides contribute to a comprehensive evaluation.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "to evaluate alternatives for bridging the value gap",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    },
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 1,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "8e734319-dd0e-4685-b4ad-a85afe72d8d8",
      "evidence": "The overall narrative emphasizes the need to resolve the value gap issue.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "to highlight the importance of addressing the value gap",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}