{
  "docId": "019de06f-ab40-774b-8c1e-57e04c8545c5",
  "docSlug": "5d9f93dd54d6ca4afab115467c562ff9",
  "documentTitle": "Barclays | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 12 slides",
  "authorId": "barclays",
  "authorName": "Barclays",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-08-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.2981745,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 12,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 200,
  "notes": "The slide compares valuation metrics across different offer prices ($38-$46) using two distinct methodologies, showing enterprise value multiples and yield statistics.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-ab40-774b-8c1e-57e04c8545c5/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-ab40-774b-8c1e-57e04c8545c5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-ab40-774b-8c1e-57e04c8545c5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-ab40-774b-8c1e-57e04c8545c5#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Company filings, press releases and FactSet. Projections provided by the Company or ArcLight. 1-5 footnotes detailing methodology.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5a7155ac-89e7-4354-a01d-1bed9835eee4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Purchase Price Ratio Analysis table comparing Cash Flow Parity and LP Attributable methodologies across various offer prices and financial metrics.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "00e74fa2-be05-409d-a12d-91209883325e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Trans Am Purchase Price Ratio Comparison (Cont'd)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "917275d8-8011-46f8-b03e-a46db7c2e39b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "c7515384-1d99-4db3-85ef-d24aa877a55a",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Financials",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-financials",
      "evidence": "Slides 6-10 provide peer benchmark and comparison tables on Trans Am's financials",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "951b55ef-9dd1-4a51-b7bd-aeabde0f62c0",
      "evidence": "Slides 6-10 provide peer benchmark and comparison tables",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To evaluate the purchase price and trading comparables",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}