{
  "docId": "019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094",
  "docSlug": "2d2314f5ddaefb3ad676e3566ebe1e9e",
  "documentTitle": "Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 25 slides",
  "authorId": "goldman-sachs",
  "authorName": "Goldman Sachs",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-07-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 25,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The table tracks qualitative assessment across 9 brokers.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.29,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "PRELIMINARY CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8bb03e46-392d-419e-be43-50e8c33cd30b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.48,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Wall Street Research. Note: * Indicates commentary found in general Midstream or Antero Resources coverage report",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ed705829-7644-4f72-bc2f-74bdc9af82ee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.68,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Broker, Discusses Transaction, Models Transaction, Expresses Recommendation, Recommendation / Commentary",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c78dea03-b8be-4de5-819b-c399661e4306",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Summary of Research Analyst Assessment of Potential Transaction",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6ae0abe0-aea3-4e91-b192-f99bf3251077",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "a626999d-61ea-417a-83b6-b0ed4fcf5429",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Financial analysis highlights challenges and complexities",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "15f6397e-c5e1-4e15-a4a5-8de5672ccd7e",
      "evidence": "The deck systematically presents financial data to build a logical argument",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Understand the financial implications of the transaction",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}