{
  "docId": "019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094",
  "docSlug": "2d2314f5ddaefb3ad676e3566ebe1e9e",
  "documentTitle": "Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 25 slides",
  "authorId": "goldman-sachs",
  "authorName": "Goldman Sachs",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-07-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 25,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 96,
  "notes": "The slide uses a matrix of bar charts to compare 'Status Quo' vs 'Pro Forma' earnings per share across different deal structures.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-a726-717c-8e29-3f88f266c094#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Grouped bar charts showing Status Quo vs Pro Forma EPS for 2019-2022 across 6 scenarios",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0fa2e91f-3d6c-4426-af3d-e6fad661a4da",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Status Quo (Dark Blue), Pro Forma (Light Blue), Accretion / (Dilution) (Yellow Ovals)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2d207082-6516-4253-b7c8-33df8acdf856",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Value of Midstream Distributions to Upstream on a Per Upstream Share Basis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "135577e0-6541-4f52-85c1-71c98d956bbb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Arkose Projections and Bloomberg market data as of 13-Jul-2018 Note: Assumes 18.5mm shares issued to Series B. Pro forma coverage assumes distribution policy for 2019 set so that Midstream unitholders receive the same distribution as in the status quo case on an adjusted exchange ratio basis, then constant coverage thereafter.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9635b6ab-6da9-49dd-bf41-75240af65391",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Accretion / (Dilution) Analysis | Upstream Perspective",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bb214b94-957a-4f91-a8be-f1b4695d0907",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "960c2d92-4081-45a6-a806-44dd3407ea87",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-grouped: Grouped bar charts showing Status Quo vs Pro Forma EPS for 2019-2022 across 6 scenarios",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "0a5413cf-f60d-42f9-beef-067a81b7ca4b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "In-depth financial analysis and data support the proposed solution",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "15f6397e-c5e1-4e15-a4a5-8de5672ccd7e",
      "evidence": "The deck systematically presents financial data to build a logical argument",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Understand the financial implications of the transaction",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    },
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "202ee3fc-91df-494c-98f8-d0014b8be1e1",
      "evidence": "Financial analysis implies consequences of inaction",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Highlight the risks of not taking action",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}