{
  "docId": "019de06f-9121-765b-aa3f-3b2350b9cd13",
  "docSlug": "6cd8c22e3b149abc105b4e66968d6a00",
  "documentTitle": "Morgan Stanley | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 42 slides",
  "authorId": "morgan-stanley",
  "authorName": "Morgan Stanley",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-03-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 24,
  "pageCount": 42,
  "prevPage": 23,
  "nextPage": 25,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 60,
  "notes": "Project Alpine, Morgan Stanley deck, page 24.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-9121-765b-aa3f-3b2350b9cd13/24",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-9121-765b-aa3f-3b2350b9cd13",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-9121-765b-aa3f-3b2350b9cd13.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-9121-765b-aa3f-3b2350b9cd13#slide-24",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.24,
        "x": 0.38,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Confidential Working Draft",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a02c8093-d6f4-410e-a4e5-5e26888e8be0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.23,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.31
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Pro forma AMGP would be projected to have higher growth with a similar yield as EQGP. Pro forma DCF and EBITDA multiples projected to be attractive for new AMGP. Pro forma AMGP projected to have minimal debt / 2019E EBITDA leverage compared to peers.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5d26b346-aad9-435c-844a-d56cab32b37e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Capital IQ, Company projections for AM & AMGP",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6f416c20-a25a-4aa1-87bb-38927f8da72a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Trading summary table comparing EQT GP, ONEOK, Targa, and Antero Midstream (SA and PF).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4b8d53fa-63ed-4dc0-ac62-9413f84dcc4c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.29,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Peer Trading Metrics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aa950c66-1555-48a2-a22e-918e2c91e4ac",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4b24fdb0-b808-49f2-8a34-fb26c861a295",
      "evidence": "Table comparing financial metrics across multiple peer companies.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 17,
      "beatId": "ccea110c-9098-481a-a083-05a5a6d87bb5",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Provides detailed financial analysis and data tables",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 17,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "f748ad73-2977-48da-8e9b-b5927d68ab1c",
      "evidence": "Presents financial analysis and conclusions",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Assess the impact of inaction",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}