{
  "docId": "019de06f-8727-7305-aa8a-0f1cc9311f88",
  "docSlug": "d34e3ebbefa07bda41cee30322b1331a",
  "documentTitle": "Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 94 slides",
  "authorId": "trian-partners",
  "authorName": "Trian Partners",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2017-09-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 79,
  "pageCount": 94,
  "prevPage": 78,
  "nextPage": 80,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "Uses a two-part structure: first highlighting the irrationality of the proxy contest, then listing specific governance failures.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-8727-7305-aa8a-0f1cc9311f88/79",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-8727-7305-aa8a-0f1cc9311f88",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-8727-7305-aa8a-0f1cc9311f88.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-8727-7305-aa8a-0f1cc9311f88#slide-79",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.44
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Nelson will look to make P&G best-in-class from a corporate governance perspective:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4c6ff718-786c-4dde-a723-c40dbececa6c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.11
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The fact that P&G chose to engage in a proxy contest with Trian, rather than settle, speaks to the state of P&G’s corporate governance given:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cfd0099c-2a29-41b7-bc71-bb2ca3059368",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.21,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Trian asked for one Board seat and Nelson has committed to recommending that the Board reappoint the P&G nominee who is not re-elected\nTrian has substantial “skin in the game”… ownership of ~$3.5bn of P&G stock… as opposed to other independent Directors who collectively own less than $0.1bn of P&G stock\nNelson’s long track record of revitalizing CPG companies",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "84285e15-7cef-4dab-84e6-c59ca6be34e8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.42,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.52
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1) Creating long-term shareholder value: 9 of 10 independent Directors saw P&G’s stock significantly underperform peers on their watch (see page 9)\n2) Direct CPG experience on the Board: Nelson brings significant CPG experience to the Board. The existing Board has virtually no CPG experience outside of P&G\n3) Succession planning: 3 CEO changes in the last 8 years. All 3 were internal candidates with NO external experience\n4) Long-term strategic planning: Long-term financial and strategic planning is ultimately the Board’s responsibility. Lack of a consistent strategy at P&G has been a key driver of market share losses\n5) Aligning compensation to performance: Management has been paid generously – receiving around 100% of their annual target bonuses while P&G has underperformed. Nelson will seek to ensure the Company’s compensation program is aligned with shareholders’ interests",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "477af115-1664-435b-a1c5-61510867df64",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Trian Strategic Initiative: Improve Corporate Governance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "32ec9b62-26dc-4313-9e02-d0c24ec564a0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "governance",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3a91c238-2889-4025-977c-74260c10c99c",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly frames the argument around corporate governance failures and improvements.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 85,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "3dc80ba5-80de-4e7d-be90-f3f4aab11f9f",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Expose Contradiction",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The deck highlights contradictions in P&G's claims and performance, demonstrating the need for change.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 82,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "e27a81dd-9032-4d73-8408-516f6c820aa0",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Propose Solution",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Trian Partners presents their strategic initiatives to address P&G's challenges.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}