{
  "docId": "019de06f-66ea-76d7-8972-f721f81719dd",
  "docSlug": "972689f9b389f322a3ca266206b18e63",
  "documentTitle": "Greensill Capital | Investor Presentation Deck | 17 slides",
  "authorId": "greensill-capital",
  "authorName": "Greensill Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2016-03-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 17,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "problem_statement",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The chart uses a long-tail distribution curve to represent supplier spend, highlighting a 'gap' in the middle segment.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-66ea-76d7-8972-f721f81719dd/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-66ea-76d7-8972-f721f81719dd",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de06f-66ea-76d7-8972-f721f81719dd.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-66ea-76d7-8972-f721f81719dd#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.31,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Up to 60-75% of COGS were previously unaddressed by industry solutions due to inflexibility and drawbacks of the other solutions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "03ea1b5b-ef2c-4073-893b-5eae0e022edb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.61,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Smallest suppliers are addressed by Dynamic Discounting, Factoring and/or Commercial Cards",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "728d98c2-4e19-45de-a066-00a83ff807aa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Largest suppliers are addressed by traditional bank SCF programs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8bc4965d-c948-4a14-a373-751dd84fb26d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.275
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Long-tail distribution of supplier spend",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "area",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4ed51024-0f62-4f55-98da-4889e5ca5c7c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "But There is a Large Gap in what Existing Solutions Address",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "59990f7d-c945-47b4-aaa0-24f97cf90f1f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Problem Statement Canvas",
      "slug": "problem-statement-canvas",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "85c5e828-9e75-42d3-a4ae-33153aea4294",
      "evidence": "Up to 60-75% of COGS were previously unaddressed by industry solutions due to inflexibility and drawbacks of the other solutions",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "long-tail-distribution",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "da439060-0232-4ae7-ac3a-4d0a70eb0755",
      "evidence": "The chart visualizes a power-law or long-tail distribution of supplier spend.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "f98369b3-3f7d-4774-bac9-9c8105769573",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the gaps and inefficiencies in existing solutions",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "c872a55c-f213-4578-aff4-6b176fec94ff",
      "evidence": "The deck implies that not addressing the gaps will result in lost opportunities",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the costs of not addressing the gaps in existing solutions?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}