{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-13726e30e3a1",
  "docSlug": "93bc5d70116e",
  "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
  "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2014-03-31 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 19,
  "pageCount": 108,
  "prevPage": 18,
  "nextPage": 20,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 22,
  "notes": "Uses a custom 'fully-leased EBITDA' metric to normalize for real estate ownership structures.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-13726e30e3a1/19",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-13726e30e3a1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-13726e30e3a1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-13726e30e3a1#slide-19",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Despite high AUVs and industry leading revenue, Darden’s operating performance is significantly worse than peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7b7e12ef-4235-4a22-b674-2f934f937c59",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Estimated LTM EBITDA margins on a fully-leased basis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7fe850ea-883b-44b8-a4ae-71aee71e695a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "We believe fully-leased EBITDA is the best metric by which to judge Darden’s operating performance, as opposed to the earnings generated through site selection and capital investment in real estate.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "753ec7d9-acdc-437f-9abe-2c08eabc090e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Adjusting for real estate ownership, Darden’s margins are significantly below peers, despite the fact that it has an enormous scale advantage and is led by Olive Garden, which should be an extremely profitable concept given its high AUVs and pasta focus.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d7f6cab9-1dc6-477b-a8c8-8f1b568ec060",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Company filings, Capital IQ, company presentations and Green Street Advisors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8912ef49-7870-4bc1-9ce8-9ccf02584e49",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "2013 AUVs and LTM Revenue data for peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2b54dd06-0a55-40e0-b61b-a52842fb7f6f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Management and the Board have not earned the right to rush this critical and irreversible decision (cont'd)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "044716ef-be93-46b7-838e-8abfecb383cd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "8a2f622e-2817-41d7-a78e-c104cf0ad6c4",
      "evidence": "2013 AUVs and LTM Revenue data for peers",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "b6222e8c-871f-4fc1-a329-6c9b04aa074b",
      "evidence": "Comparison of DRI margins against peer group",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 87,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "8a080961-ba9c-43e7-a2d4-04d2cdae026a",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The document critiques management and the board's decision-making process",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 87,
      "from": 14,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "f076922b-174b-48e3-9636-f933eda00dce",
      "evidence": "The document emphasizes the potential destruction of shareholder value",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the potential costs of inaction (i.e., allowing the separation to proceed)",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 8,
      "name": "Hypothesis Test",
      "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
      "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
      "matchId": "df2d3040-7d78-43ad-b942-a37394e69518",
      "evidence": "The document presents valuation concerns and governance critiques",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Test the hypothesis that the separation is not in investors' best interests",
      "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}