{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3",
  "docSlug": "ccf0af92c506",
  "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
  "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
  "authorName": "Darden",
  "documentKindSlug": "regulatory-filing",
  "documentKindLabel": "Regulatory filing",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2014-09-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 18,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "function": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 24,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparative structure to refute Starboard's claims regarding REIT valuation and feasibility.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Starboard Inaccurately Uses Inflated LTM Multiples...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-3f3d-76db-b32a-8ad9e35c4790",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.28,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.52
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "And a Darden REIT Would Not Be Best-in-Class",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0c4c35df-1e5e-4b71-9123-cb29092bf779",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.22,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.53,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "REIT Transaction Could Be Destabilizing for Credit Rating",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "73db1d0c-e437-4203-9dcb-acd428f9c4b3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.28,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Starboard Inaccurately Uses Inflated LTM Multiples",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dea2aba9-0715-47e8-82fe-9d863516aeb4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "valuation multiple: 11.5x",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-3f3d-76db-b32a-8cda85423645",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.87,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Public filings, Starboard \"Real Estate Primer\", 31-Mar-2014",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5bade59d-5135-4bb5-844a-a1b434e6ffc6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.28,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.53,
        "y": 0.52
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "And Starboard Appears to Ignore Value Destructive Friction Costs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0b3f3a9a-1a8e-4c29-bd38-e67dcbf2feca",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Our Board's Rigorous Analysis Indicated that the Formation of a Darden REIT Could Be Subject to Significant Valuation Risks and Impose Meaningful Friction Costs for Darden",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5ed088d5-5f67-4d19-82ae-ea7b5e08747b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "cb22df41-2533-48f1-8259-514d9d1aa35f",
      "evidence": "And Starboard Appears to Ignore Value Destructive Friction Costs",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "7b88e280-d624-477e-a812-44b990b82703",
      "evidence": "REIT Transaction Could Be Destabilizing for Credit Rating",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "preempt_rebuttal",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8568320f-8e5f-4737-8f73-f1fca7610cfa",
      "evidence": "The slide systematically refutes specific claims made by an activist investor (Starboard) regarding valuation, credit, and costs.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "fc7607d5-5cb8-4d01-9956-28618418f5ba",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Slides 5-9 highlight the potential risks and complications associated with Starboard's proposals.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "3980a12d-67bb-443c-a8b6-fb93e6831be3",
      "evidence": "The document highlights the potential risks and value destruction associated with Starboard's proposals, implying that not adopting them may be the best option.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What is the cost of not adopting Starboard's proposals?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}