{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3",
  "docSlug": "ccf0af92c506",
  "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
  "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
  "authorName": "Darden",
  "documentKindSlug": "regulatory-filing",
  "documentKindLabel": "Regulatory filing",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2014-09-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 18,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "function": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to map specific strategic proposals to their negative consequences.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "process_diagram",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-ccd1d6676fd3#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Our Detailed Analysis to Date Has Indicated that Starboard’s Proposals Would Not Enhance Value",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-3f3c-7011-a9ae-74ad6f1cecf5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Strategic Alternatives tree",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d2ab5f3d-0529-4a99-a3ff-6446f29695e6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.558,
        "y": 0.26
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Risks associated with Real Estate, Specialty Restaurants Separation, and Refranchising.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bd75ec50-6d4c-474f-9d04-89cbf661d8cd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.558,
        "y": 0.225
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Issues Considered By the Board",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7802b036-955f-48b7-8312-f5ba86f934bc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Our Detailed Analysis to Date Has Indicated that Starboard's Proposals Would Not Enhance Value",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f25c0de5-ed0f-4a44-9235-08c88e9ea2cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Problem Statement Canvas",
      "slug": "problem-statement-canvas",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "9ccec064-5e2f-4b5d-aba9-3371a1088a2b",
      "evidence": "Starboard's proposals would not enhance value due to significant operational, financial, and tax risks",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Storytelling: audience calibration",
      "slug": "audience",
      "agent": "storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "fcbd1871-f291-4507-8d81-716ac2554099",
      "evidence": "Issues Considered By the Board",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "causal-chain",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "112864f6-a774-4ba6-b60d-f4cb529ef39a",
      "evidence": "Maps strategic alternatives to specific negative outcomes/risks.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "fc7607d5-5cb8-4d01-9956-28618418f5ba",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Slides 5-9 highlight the potential risks and complications associated with Starboard's proposals.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "3980a12d-67bb-443c-a8b6-fb93e6831be3",
      "evidence": "The document highlights the potential risks and value destruction associated with Starboard's proposals, implying that not adopting them may be the best option.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What is the cost of not adopting Starboard's proposals?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}