{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-bac87207629e",
  "docSlug": "2ea5a5e44206",
  "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": "Elliott",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 21,
  "pageCount": 53,
  "prevPage": 20,
  "nextPage": 22,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the 'Phillips Today' column with red 'X' marks to emphasize negative performance metrics.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "subtitle_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-bac87207629e/21",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-bac87207629e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-bac87207629e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-bac87207629e#slide-21",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Refining and midstream have contrasting risk/return propositions, with weak capital returns vs. refiners and poor growth vs. midstream",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-f5d0-745c-bec3-dcc603f98706",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "valuation multiple: 6-7x",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-f5d0-745c-bec3-e25128dfdb65",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.11
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Refining and midstream have contrasting risk/return propositions, with weak capital returns vs. refiners and poor growth vs. midstream",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2de104ad-99de-46d2-867e-03369e3246f2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Bloomberg. 1) 4Q24 EPS of ($0.15). 2) Based on 2026E multiples.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4755bb63-4468-4e76-ab85-6f3c77b4371f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of Refining vs Midstream vs Phillips Today across 5 key metrics.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "357a0393-657a-4e09-b47e-b6d68dea400c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "PHILLIPS' REFINING AND MIDSTREAM BUSINESSES DO NOT FIT TOGETHER",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3a80c991-4e84-4291-96d3-9289396ce6de",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Sum of parts",
      "slug": "sum-of-parts",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "document",
      "matchId": "019dda04-ec17-7762-b464-7b42aa0c5d4a",
      "evidence": "page_metadata.slide_type IN (sop_buildup, valuation_reveal)",
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3ab101f6-5fc9-4533-b139-39a9ea66f239",
      "evidence": "Comparison matrix of Refining vs Midstream vs Phillips Today across 5 key metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "36b0342f-be56-49e7-b1d6-3055f7c81cd0",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a side-by-side comparison table to highlight the misalignment between two business segments.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 34,
      "from": 17,
      "beatId": "5fd9f678-d137-462d-8f1d-1a05b46622bc",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck agitates the problem by highlighting the company's poor commercial function and failure to deliver on initiatives",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}