{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb",
  "docSlug": "48a8cbf2f1d7",
  "documentTitle": "Arconic Inc. (ARNC)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": "Elliott",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2017-04-11 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 85,
  "pageCount": 336,
  "prevPage": 84,
  "nextPage": 86,
  "slideType": "peer_gap",
  "function": "expose_gap",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "Uses a combination of a combo chart (bar/line) and a bar chart to contrast operational efficiency and asset intensity.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb/85",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-571191cc7adb#slide-85",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.6,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "PCC had better margins when it was the same size as EPS is today; EPS actually has greater Net Property, Plant and Equipment than Precision Castparts",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c3d3dfbc-2e3d-4f44-b762-bf5bc351d3cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "When PCC Had Between $5-$7 billion of Sales – Segment-Level Margins",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "558e9bf1-105b-4cd1-a33e-4675dbff84f1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Net PP&E",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2a0025bf-f165-4762-88cb-b68bc39d3d31",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA margin: 21%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0392-76bd-8ef8-ebf8526ec90e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Management needs a different excuse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "caad3386-c34a-4f86-a0a4-25b9a3f71273",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: PCC FY 2010-FY 2013 10-K, Company filings. Note: EPS Net PP&E based on share of depreciation (51%); PCC Net PP&E is based on CY 2015 (i.e., December 31, 2015 balance sheet figure)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cea5d922-5055-4c33-904e-6b4ef5d1cba7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "EPS Results: Gap with PCC Is Not a Scale Issue",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "584c949c-da9f-4c55-9ac6-ed0a1f98fa1b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "103897df-db6b-41f3-8b83-b253550a0678",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of historical PCC performance vs current Arconic EPS to invalidate a scale-based excuse.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}