{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-50b46d52e1ad",
  "docSlug": "773321d6b0d7",
  "documentTitle": "Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": "Jesse Cohn",
  "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
  "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2016-11-28 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 16,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table followed by a narrative argument to frame Cognizant as 'shareholder-unfriendly' due to its capital allocation strategy.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table",
    "paragraph",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-50b46d52e1ad/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-50b46d52e1ad",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-50b46d52e1ad.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-50b46d52e1ad#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Cognizant is viewed as being shareholder-unfriendly.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0f1e-7015-901d-4bb77f327c79",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.155,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.715
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Investor perspective on revenue growth dependence; Operational perspective on growth-at-all-costs mindset.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "96f4e837-73eb-4da8-bcd8-b394c829584f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "NTM P/E: 20.3x",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0f1e-7015-901d-4f20a4c1fe35",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.085,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.605
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Cognizant, on the other hand, gets penalized with a significant discount. Because Cognizant has a limited capital return program and explicitly commits not to expand margins...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "27542ce4-a8ff-466a-962b-7f31e485dcee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.135,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.455
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The last point in the table is worth emphasizing – Cognizant is viewed as being shareholder-unfriendly. In contrast, Accenture is viewed as being a responsible steward of shareholder capital...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f8452def-032f-46b9-8965-6273322277b8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.285,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.145
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of Share Repurchases, Dividends, M&A, Cash Return, and Valuation for Cognizant and Accenture.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6135814e-9efe-4a4a-9c81-762018ce394f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.025,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.102
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Comparison of Capital Return Priorities – Cognizant vs. Accenture",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc0c196e-e2f2-45f4-b3ce-74c56e60ba45",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "capital-allocation-framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "90938fd0-e704-46b5-8d3d-a8bcf6ce94ca",
      "evidence": "Comparison of share repurchases, dividends, M&A, and cash return policies.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "7c0c44eb-0325-446b-922d-6cca1d7ac811",
      "evidence": "Direct side-by-side comparison of two companies to highlight valuation differences.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "683cd47e-f58e-4209-8a4c-3c7a49a789cd",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "The document proposes a solution, the value-enhancement plan, to improve Cognizant's profitability and valuation.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 9,
      "name": "Hypothesis Test",
      "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
      "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
      "matchId": "e3d89b3e-2ffb-4c2a-b48d-f2dd6d243298",
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear plan and uses data to support its claims.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Can the proposed value-enhancement plan improve Cognizant's profitability and valuation?",
      "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}