{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-37eb478b579f",
  "docSlug": "43bbd9fb77dc",
  "documentTitle": "Hess Corporation (HES)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": "Elliott Management",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2013-03-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.2941177,
  "pageNumber": 39,
  "pageCount": 71,
  "prevPage": 38,
  "nextPage": 40,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "The slide uses a green border to highlight the Shareholder Nominees column, visually framing them as the preferred choice.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "pie_chart",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote",
    "logo_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-37eb478b579f/39",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-37eb478b579f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-37eb478b579f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-37eb478b579f#slide-39",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.18,
        "x": 0.77,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Which nominees are better suited for a pure-play E&P company?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1a2d6991-0d9e-4c19-a557-13524c9c35ee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.18,
        "x": 0.77,
        "y": 0.37
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Which nominees are better suited for a corporate transformation?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7830be45-c0a8-4f69-b1eb-274491925348",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.18,
        "x": 0.77,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Which nominees will have the ability to ask the right questions?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ce90b000-4052-42b1-8a93-6729f11ca4fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.18,
        "x": 0.77,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Which nominees are more likely to positively impact governance?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d1c6cf3c-a4b9-4b0f-9ea1-0eae89235875",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Pie charts showing Yes/No percentages for experience categories",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "pie",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ce2b1c28-dc09-4c1b-9f59-7c99566e7aba",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "relevant experience: 80%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-fb97-7552-b569-7c32e9bbf742",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "* Unconventional experience includes Kevin Meyers for 1½ years in his role as SVP ConocoPhillips Americas. Senior Management Oil & Gas Upstream Operating Experience does not include Mark Williams as his primary executive experience was overseeing Shell downstream division",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e0a040aa-bbdf-418c-9a70-4bed282bf8c1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.72
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Director count comparison table",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b8f96a77-55d7-435b-939f-4158824b12fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Shareholder Nominees Have the Relevant Oil & Gas Operating and Restructuring Experience Needed at Hess",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0f4f5584-2d03-4952-b78f-c82cec785fc5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8765def7-cf90-4ace-976d-1df6968ef258",
      "evidence": "Direct side-by-side comparison of two nominee groups across identical metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 59,
      "from": 33,
      "beatId": "0f29d29f-cd13-41b4-9dee-478bf0a3d295",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "The Struggle",
      "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle",
      "evidence": "Elliott Management presents its recommendations for change and the benefits of increased accountability.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 70,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "85bccce2-ca46-412f-9f7f-9f34f493fcd2",
      "evidence": "The document repeatedly emphasizes the consequences of not implementing substantial changes.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "The cost of inaction (lack of accountability) is highlighted throughout the presentation.",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 69,
      "from": 14,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "6f974f5d-2a31-4b3a-a651-08be791c3818",
      "evidence": "The document uses various tables and charts to illustrate the points being made.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "The presentation provides a detailed breakdown of the issues and proposed solutions.",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}