{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-bf6e72adba7f",
  "docSlug": "118452fbd911",
  "documentTitle": "Herbalife, Ltd. (HLF)",
  "authorId": "01_Pershing_Square",
  "authorName": "William Ackman",
  "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
  "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2016-07-20 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 22,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 21,
  "nextPage": 23,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison frame to establish a legal precedent by equating the Herbalife case to the Vemma case.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "logo_grid",
    "comparison_table",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-bf6e72adba7f/22",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-bf6e72adba7f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-bf6e72adba7f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-bf6e72adba7f#slide-22",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.82
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The FTC's findings are substantively identical to the FTC's conclusions in Vemma",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8e681e3f-9e77-4b72-b3b4-f923eec00e35",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Herbalife Logo",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5c90de9f-c0e0-42c5-99e5-2eb7605eb4b1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.56,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Vemma Logo",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d5248231-9c6a-414c-9e0e-7b4ebc7e8329",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Side-by-side comparison of FTC conclusions for Herbalife and Vemma.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "713e47a8-4d7e-4192-b002-c9fe16ede537",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "\"In sum, Defendants' compensation structure incentivizes Distributors to purchase thousands of dollars of product to receive recruiting-based rewards and to recruit new participants who will do the same...\" — FTC v. Herbalife International of America, Inc., et al. (July 15, 2016). \"In sum, unlike legitimate multilevel marketing businesses, Defendants reward Affiliates for recruiting and for purchasing products to maintain bonus eligibility rather than for selling products to ultimate-user consumers...\" — FTC v. Vemma Nutrition Company, et al. (August 17, 2015).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-70f4-766c-b4dd-28660508dd18",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "(1) FTC v. Herbalife International of America, Inc., et al. (July 15, 2016). Case No.2:16-cv-05217, Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief, at p.38. (2) FTC v. Vemma Nutrition Company, et al. (August 17, 2015). Case No.15-cv-01578, Dkt. No.9. Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief, at p.22.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3e021b13-7068-43e4-9084-b4c9285e522e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Herbalife: FTC's Findings Nearly Identical to Vemma",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9cf68251-1458-4b5d-b73d-84bc80f10568",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "authority_citation",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "01cc7321-2a85-4c8d-ae0a-baab955d76ac",
      "evidence": "Use of FTC legal complaints as the primary source of truth.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4b0837cc-e343-442c-b5ef-8ce5a57b3b98",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side presentation of two entities to establish similarity.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}