{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-38d8804ef6d4",
  "docSlug": "7d738951d1e5",
  "documentTitle": "General Growth Properties (GGWPQ)",
  "authorId": "01_Pershing_Square",
  "authorName": "Pershing Square",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2009-05-27 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 44,
  "pageCount": 68,
  "prevPage": 43,
  "nextPage": 45,
  "slideType": "precedent_table",
  "function": "cite_precedent",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 14,
  "notes": "The slide highlights the widespread application of the Till precedent in bankruptcy proceedings.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-38d8804ef6d4/44",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-38d8804ef6d4",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-38d8804ef6d4.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-38d8804ef6d4#slide-44",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Since the Supreme Court ruling in 2004, Till has been applied in numerous bankruptcy proceedings",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f843c9d6-cfea-4c72-b460-d7b2f293bb00",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "interest rate",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-14d7-73fd-9f51-b4a1cf382254",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: The above list is not meant to be comprehensive.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "29e3401c-6ecc-4b15-9eda-61d08d1b5ecc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Cases: In re Bivens, In re Cachu, In re Cantwell, In re Flores, In re Harken, In re Pokrzywinski, In re Prussia Associates; Rates: Prime + 2.25%, Prime + 0.5%, Prime + 1.0%, Prime + 1.0%, Prime + 3.0%, Prime + 1.5%, Prime + 1.5%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "caacfd83-794c-4c0d-865c-daad825402f3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The Progeny of Till",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "87dfe1bd-2840-4649-9ea0-76a9fc3b9aff",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "authority-citation",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "981f5a61-dbef-4a6c-970d-b0f4c5bbbe12",
      "evidence": "Citing legal precedents to establish the validity of a legal argument.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 68,
      "from": 35,
      "beatId": "169e941d-9840-4b8e-a722-5cc6448c842f",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "The presentation proposes a solution for reorganization, providing relief for secured creditors.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.9,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 50,
      "from": 36,
      "name": "Hypothesis Test",
      "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
      "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
      "matchId": "e2c1c744-9c7e-466a-b9b5-c6482f4a63d4",
      "evidence": "The presentation tests the hypothesis that re-pricing GGP's debt to Till-mandated rates would allow for a more favorable reorganization.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "What if GGP's debt were re-priced to Till-mandated rates?",
      "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}