{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-931d15d7e8ac",
  "docSlug": "c71f39d7ed80",
  "documentTitle": "SMART Global Holdings, Inc. (SGH)",
  "authorId": "60_Wolfpack_Research",
  "authorName": "Wolfpack Research",
  "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
  "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2019-09-25 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 24,
  "pageCount": 35,
  "prevPage": 23,
  "nextPage": 25,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a specific historical precedent (SMOD case) to argue for a pattern of behavior by the CEO.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-931d15d7e8ac/24",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-931d15d7e8ac",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-931d15d7e8ac.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-931d15d7e8ac#slide-24",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "This transaction begs for more disclosure. It naturally raises questions of self-dealing, and exposes the inherent weaknesses in SGH’s corporate governance with Shah at the helm.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b4-70ad-b392-8ad984c8a008",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.77,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Wolfpack Research logo",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2810af89-2b4e-4876-883e-6e5e62246f66",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "book value",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b4-70ad-b392-8f9e48f359a6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Analysis of financial discrepancies, questioning the $12 million purchase price vs. $860k revenue and negative book value.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0bc17e3e-171d-4f25-8e79-aae553710b4e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.52
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Discussion of corporate governance, potential self-dealing, and the SMOD precedent.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "500f39ea-f52e-4cd4-83ff-2fce86e000f2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "References to SGH 2018 Proxy and Walpole vs. SMART Modular Technologies.",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "21f55942-966b-4176-82da-a23fe85d12ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.145
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Balance Sheet excerpt for Inforce Computing (India) Private Limited showing negative reserves.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f7d4b263-a0f0-46fb-9b97-afa940f636d8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "authority-citation",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "cbee20ab-2e38-4122-bbdc-5da265f6602c",
      "evidence": "Uses legal case precedent (Walpole vs. SMART Modular) to establish a pattern of behavior.",
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    {
      "name": "fraud-exposure",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9307e1dd-f88c-482f-bc3e-8cd361f830d5",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly links financial data to a narrative of self-dealing and governance failure.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}