{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-648c05e927ed",
  "docSlug": "ea3395f0d3bd",
  "documentTitle": "Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP)",
  "authorId": "60_Wolfpack_Research",
  "authorName": "Wolfpack Research",
  "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
  "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2020-04-22 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 57,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "function": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "Uses a funnel-like process flow to show how the TAM is reduced by applying realistic filters (non-compliance, anatomy eligibility, BMI/AHI/age limits).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "process_diagram",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-648c05e927ed/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-648c05e927ed",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-648c05e927ed.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-648c05e927ed#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "we felt it was worth showing that simply using realistic estimates, Inspire's best-case TAM falls by ~80%, to 104,125 units versus their claim of 500,000.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5375-7572-b873-974bc7da98a9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.48,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.29,
        "y": 0.165
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Funnel calculation of TAM",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9f886ca4-7fd7-4421-92f0-455279e06f4b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "TAM: 104,125",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5375-7572-b873-98b9071fd92f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.68
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "We still consider the above estimate to be highly optimistic because it entirely ignores patient choice, among other factors. However, we felt it was worth showing that simply using realistic estimates, Inspire's best-case TAM falls by ~80%, to 104,125 units versus their claim of 500,000. We elaborate on the numerous other flaws in Inspire's methodology below.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "090da1a0-da76-4170-b889-c0ea60293705",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Below is our calculation, employing the same approach, but using realistic and verifiable numbers:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5736edb5-cd07-4054-8ef8-f97bddd99626",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Analytical method",
      "slug": "analytical-method",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "be74b1ce-1a83-4028-9bbb-bb8f87737496",
      "evidence": "We still consider the above estimate to be highly optimistic because it entirely ignores patient choice, among other factors.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Hypothesis-Driven Structure",
      "slug": "hypothesis-driven-structure",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "481bf4a6-52e9-4cfa-85a2-a9d869c06ed5",
      "evidence": "Below is our calculation, employing the same approach, but using realistic and verifiable numbers:",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "decomposition",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "68fee328-715a-41db-a3b0-4315283c750f",
      "evidence": "Breaking down a large TAM claim into smaller, realistic segments using filters.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "e9079ce5-c7de-4121-8615-3ae679f7ffcd",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "The Struggle",
      "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle",
      "evidence": "The document presents the limitations and side effects of the product",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 14,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "83735121-ef20-47de-bdeb-a1fe30c3f52e",
      "evidence": "The document presents an alternative to CPAP that is effective and minimally invasive",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To highlight the cost of inaction for investors",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}