{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-2ecae53b8884",
  "docSlug": "e1eb4b2e6802",
  "documentTitle": "Lasertec Corporation (6920)",
  "authorId": "58_Scorpion_Capital",
  "authorName": "Scorpion Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
  "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2024-06-05 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 43,
  "pageCount": 56,
  "prevPage": 42,
  "nextPage": 44,
  "slideType": "executive_summary",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The slide details specific technical and commercial reasons for TSMC's shift away from Lasertec's EUV inspection tools, citing pellicle issues, high-NA adoption, and reliance on KLA alternatives.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-2ecae53b8884/43",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-2ecae53b8884",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-2ecae53b8884.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-2ecae53b8884#slide-43",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "TSMCは、レーザーテック製極端紫外線マスク検査装置を生産ラインの使用に適さないと判明したために、代用品として従来の深紫外線装置を使うこととなった。",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5372-7340-8f8a-bbe537214f67",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "サムスンやグローバルファウンドリーズ等の他社需要を試算しても、ASMLのEUV露光装置販売数に対し、レーザーテックの検査装置需要は四半期あたり約1台（約5000万ドル）程度と推測される。",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3043905e-682a-4542-b4d4-d3b2940dc0e4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "TSMCはレーザーテックのアクティニック検査装置を原則使用せず、KLA製品を併用。高開口数（High-NA）対応も進まず、生産ラインでは深紫外線（DUV）で十分と判断されている。",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9fcfa950-d724-4430-980d-8dad5c8283fe",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.43
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "TSMCはレーザーテック製品のシェアを最小限に抑え、KLAとの価格交渉に利用。既存のMATRICS装置の追加購入も限定的で、X9光源の問題も指摘されている。",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "de21a760-ed03-49cb-ae5c-c73b0e0cfdd9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "「TSMCでACTISのA150もA300も、生産用の対象外としています。」 — TSMCの元幹部",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5372-7340-8f8a-bfd39caa24b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "第8部 レーザーテックにとっての極端紫外線の市場は尽きてきている（続）",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "392a5c17-658c-4ec4-b3bb-0b63849090c9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "詳細サマリー・調査結果",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4cf27d7f-7b4b-4079-a165-4f2a3334ccba",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 56,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "65c67b0a-e809-454b-9a81-813392cc9bb0",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The document has a detailed analysis of the company's situation, with many pages dedicated to the executive summary.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 56,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "c1cc9a92-38b5-4731-bb15-d9d4141013da",
      "evidence": "The document has a detailed executive summary and analysis, indicating a logic chain.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To understand the company's situation and analysis",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}