{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f",
  "docSlug": "f982379e2e48",
  "documentTitle": "Lasertec Corporation (6920)",
  "authorId": "58_Scorpion_Capital",
  "authorName": "Scorpion Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2024-06-05 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 99,
  "pageCount": 334,
  "prevPage": 98,
  "nextPage": 100,
  "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 24,
  "notes": "The slide uses peer benchmarking (ASML, Applied Materials, Lam, Tokyo Electron, KLA) to establish a baseline for 'normal' inventory levels.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f/99",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f#slide-99",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "First two methodologies – normalizing inventory to peer group % of sales; and to % of assets; other methods shown in next chapter",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "73e5f01e-4787-4300-adfc-f4ecdef66ef6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Lasertec is a relatively simple accounting fraud - one can easily estimate what its normalized inventory should be, and therefore the level by which both inventory and earnings are inflated and the size of the inevitable impairment charge and retained earnings hit.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b6-764f-bc7e-a7ff7d1a7b01",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "implied impairment charge: 63%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b6-764f-bc7e-aa62594d3c27",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.71
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Scorpion Capital analysis and estimates; Capital IQ data; Lasertec financial filings and IR materials",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "18660c9d-4244-4e91-af3d-31b437b969e6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Method 1 and Method 2 comparison tables showing implied impairment charges.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3592277d-eef7-4a08-9635-c0e6e15ba49c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.28,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Lasertec is a relatively simple accounting fraud - one can easily estimate what its normalized inventory should be, and therefore the level by which both inventory and earnings are inflated and the size of the inevitable impairment charge and retained earnings hit. Normalized inventory may be calculated by using 5 methods: 1) the 3-year average of inventory as a percent of sales across ASML, Applied Materials, Lam, Tokyo Electron, and KLA – 26% on average with little dispersion, and hence a robust measure, given similar product and business characteristics; 2) 3-year average of inventory as a percent of assets across the same peer group; 3) Lasertec’s historical, “normal” inventory as a percent of sales, from 2010 to 2017, immediately prior to its EUV product launch and before it spiked to unusual levels; 4) as a “normal” percent of its assets with the same methodology; and 5) by marking down its inventory by the 50-75% discount it is quietly offering to customers, per our research interviews, thereby adjusting it to “market value.”",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d4b47f8c-040a-4599-8990-6940addbb63e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "fraud-exposure",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d57fd144-7ca1-46a3-8789-da704cff012f",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly frames the analysis as exposing accounting fraud through inventory normalization.",
      "confidence": 1
    },
    {
      "name": "peer-benchmark",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "cf8851a2-a775-41cc-8d4d-6fee5008d22a",
      "evidence": "Uses a peer group of ASML, Applied Materials, Lam, Tokyo Electron, and KLA to establish a baseline.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}