{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f",
  "docSlug": "f982379e2e48",
  "documentTitle": "Lasertec Corporation (6920)",
  "authorId": "58_Scorpion_Capital",
  "authorName": "Scorpion Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2024-06-05 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 189,
  "pageCount": 334,
  "prevPage": 188,
  "nextPage": 190,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The slide uses a Q&A format to validate the thesis that Lasertec lacks a viable competitive moat compared to KLA.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "quote_block",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f/189",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9a-0f4bec37392f#slide-189",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Lasertec’s only use case is P2/P3, but it introduces debris in P2 which requires redundant inspection with a backup KLA DUV tool, and it’s too unreliable for P3 – eliminating any reason for its existence versus KLA.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b6-764f-bc85-c8af9d913072",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "We note that P0 refers to inspection in the mask blank shop, done by an inexpensive tool; P1 is after the blank is printed with a mask pattern, and is dominated by KLA’s Teron DUV line; P2 refers to re-inspecting the mask after repairing defect; and P3 is after adding a pellicle.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5133abca-38c1-43f5-a7b1-b6c3ffabbee9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Lasertec’s only use case is P2/P3, but it introduces debris in P2 which requires redundant inspection with a backup KLA DUV tool, and it’s too unreliable for P3 – eliminating any reason for its existence versus KLA.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6ac8f610-8ac2-435d-bac5-e1efee76f84e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "KLA owns the P1 inspection in the mask shop with their Teron product line and no one else can compete... There's a monopoly there because KLA is the only tool that has Die to Database... that's perfected and that's what KLA is good at, so they dominate the P1.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "testimonial",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "48bec092-b82b-4423-9746-600d14e96de7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "There’s a monopoly there because KLA is the only tool that has Die to Database... that’s perfected and that’s what KLA is good at, so they dominate the P1. — Former KLA executive in a leadership role in their EUV mask inspection group",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b6-764f-bc85-ce28558c1f0d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Scorpion Capital consultation calls with experts",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "44cfc7d0-af0e-41d0-9a81-72f3d1e1618d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Lasertec’s customers can’t reliably use it for P3 inspection, thus undermining the main reason for buying it and providing no benefit versus KLA’s legacy DUV inspection tool that dominates P1 inspection.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a2a747ca-35c7-4438-924e-614a968324ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "antagonist-introduction",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8eedfc1b-c74b-405c-89c5-8ef5536dd882",
      "evidence": "Frames KLA as the dominant incumbent and Lasertec as the failing challenger.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}