{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e",
  "docSlug": "c0127171790f",
  "documentTitle": "Bunge Global SA (BG)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Ben Axler",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2026-03-25 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 55,
  "pageCount": 74,
  "prevPage": 54,
  "nextPage": 56,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a red callout box to emphasize the contradiction between the 2022 deal presentation and the 2024 pro forma financials.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "data_table",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e/55",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-dfc8f9e0fa3e#slide-55",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Viterra appears to have experienced financial problems between 2022 and 2024. Bunge promoted Viterra's 2022 revenue as $72bn... Later in its 2024 pro forma supplemental, Bunge reported that Viterra's revenue was $44.2bn which is a -17.8% decline.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "23e326d8-9b11-4651-8f1d-af0d08428104",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Viterra appears to have experienced financial problems between 2022 and 2024. Bunge promoted Viterra's 2022 revenue as $72bn... Later in its 2024 pro forma supplemental, Bunge reported that Viterra's revenue was $44.2bn which is a -17.8% decline over the two-year period.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b61-7647-8704-b4e655ec2d28",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "revenue: $30bn",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b61-7647-8704-b8590d5549d3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Pro forma financials and deal presentation which is in U.S. dollars and based on fiscal year 2022 actual results.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "128587fe-c740-4d9c-a880-efae2a180cd9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Bunge Deal Presentation 2022A vs Viterra Pro Forma Financials 2024A",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "416f6722-9504-42c5-a762-5a14374e31a1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.31,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Where Did $30bn of Viterra Revenue Go?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2c75893a-38a8-4700-8bd3-cb507559b08b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de85c-6b11-7632-ac08-b8db6b282a63",
      "evidence": "'Where Did $30bn of Viterra Revenue Go?'",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Von Restorff Effect",
      "slug": "von-restorff-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de85c-6aeb-72f6-886b-fbb78b4a367f",
      "evidence": "Red box highlights $72bn vs 2024 pro forma gap",
      "confidence": 82
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "fraud-exposure",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "38522cbb-797b-4376-a0b4-e2e9000f65a4",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts past projections with current data to expose a financial discrepancy.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 66,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de85c-520e-75ff-a0c6-aabe3bf0f17d",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Operational, LATAM, Viterra deal, financial strain proof",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 61,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de85c-52d3-718b-91c0-ba5c0749e561",
      "arcName": "Tragedy",
      "arcSlug": "tragedy",
      "beatName": "Downward Spiral",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Operational, LATAM, Viterra integration failures",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 62,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 61,
      "from": 51,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019de85c-54de-7538-b8fc-e32abadb8c7e",
      "evidence": "Working capital deterioration, $1bn revolver, $19.8bn obligations, PP&E revisions.",
      "position": 8,
      "objective": "Stack evidence Viterra brought financial strain",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}