{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c6da1f4c0f8e",
  "docSlug": "fab8b03c0201",
  "documentTitle": "DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2025-10-03 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "precedent_table",
  "function": "diagnose_problem",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to compare four distinct legal cases (MA, NJ, MD, NV) across four dimensions (Status, Impact, Decision Window, Supreme Court).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c6da1f4c0f8e/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c6da1f4c0f8e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c6da1f4c0f8e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c6da1f4c0f8e#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Spruce Point believes the MA case will get moved to federal court and ultimately a petition to SCOTUS.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b7-702e-962a-d754fab7cab3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "While several states and tribes have issued cease-and-desist orders and injunctions against Kalshi, we believe the MA, NJ, MD and NV cases are the most relevant to date...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "30d529c5-f353-47fb-8687-75e96a328eae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "According to Daniel Wallach, sports gambling attorney, NJ is likely to lose and petition the court for a rehearing en banc, which means the full court, not just the three judges, listens to the argument.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b7-702e-962a-db9ad2f1f73f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: In Game, Kalshi and NJ Set for Oral Arguments in Third Circuit Case; SBC Americas, Resolution in Kalshi sports contract case likely still 2 years away; Circuit Map of Appeals Court; Gambling News, Kalshi withdraws request for injunction in Maryland; Brownstein Third Time's The Charm for Gambling Regulators in Kalshi Litigation, MA lawsuit.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "668daac5-57b3-438c-97fc-1a46c7d2d099",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.52,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of MA, NJ, MD, and NV legal cases across status, impact, and decision window.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "13a30925-4513-4488-b9f4-d62be2e5696d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Spruce Point Believes The End Game In Kalshi's Litigation Is SCOTUS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cf0664c9-abb9-46b4-8eef-ce4e48dcbe9e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "matrix-nxn",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "6dfd914d-8d39-4699-8f3b-fbf3335e3dd2",
      "evidence": "The slide organizes legal case data into a structured grid comparing four cases across four categories.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "4e1c17fc-d0a4-422f-b00f-a3e72a45a04a",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "The Struggle",
      "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle",
      "evidence": "Detailed analysis of Kalshi's advantages and DKNG's challenges",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "1fe3f2db-9941-4d09-8a4b-bb2e75d91db2",
      "evidence": "Discussion of potential downside risk for DKNG investors",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What is the cost of inaction for DKNG investors?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}