{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8",
  "docSlug": "9250edf61831",
  "documentTitle": "MSCI Inc. (MSCI)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2024-01-17 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 123,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "executive_summary",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The slide uses a traffic-light color coding system (yellow, red, grey) to organize the thesis components.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.98,
        "x": 0.01,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "We believe MSCI is a classic case of a struggling company failing to transform itself while engaging in value-destructive (and even worse nepotism-like) acquisitions and share repurchases with abusive financial reporting and accounting tactics to bolster earnings. We conducted a survey of 60 MSCI clients (~1%) which revealed greater competitive pressures in the last 12 months. Red alert: MSCI’s Chief Accounting Officer just resigned, and a Director played a role at SolarWinds which was charged two months ago by the SEC with fraud and internal control failures.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1d4cafcc-2f01-4a91-8fa1-60db77b378ae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "We believe MSCI is a classic case of a struggling company failing to transform itself while engaging in value-destructive (and even worse nepotism-like) acquisitions and share repurchases with abusive financial reporting and accounting tactics to bolster earnings.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-1ac4-74a6-be1f-ab0c77f42bd3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "downside risk: 55% - 65%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-1ac4-74a6-be1f-ae4af58edef6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.23,
        "w": 0.98,
        "x": 0.01,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "After conducting a forensic financial and accounting review of MSCI Inc. (NYSE: MSCI or “the Company”), a $48 billion dollar S&P 500 constituent and global provider of index, analytics, ESG and private asset financial products and services, Spruce Point has grave concerns about the accuracy of its accounting choices and financial reporting, durability of its growth prospects, and sustainability of its extreme valuation multiple. The world’s largest asset managers and capital allocators depend on and must trust MSCI’s indices, analytics, and ESG ratings to disburse trillions of dollars globally. However, Spruce Point does not believe that anyone has ever fully indexed, benchmarked or evaluated MSCI’s broad range of dubious and aggressive and outright farcical business practices. We lay out the case that MSCI’s ESG rating scores as an F and that its stock should be sold or underweighted relative to any large cap global equity index. Our fair value target is 55% - 65% ($190 - $244/sh.) downside risk to MSCI’s price.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc39eef4-e865-4887-9963-8fa9e7253f76",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.98,
        "x": 0.01,
        "y": 0.54
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Core Index Business Is Mature And Under Pressure; We Think MSCI Is Price Gouging + Losing Clients; Reputation Risk Is Rising",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7c08cfb6-34d2-4dbf-8d5f-42dc8cd44d2a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.31,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Spruce Point Issues \"Strong Sell\" Opinion On MSCI Inc. With 55% - 65% Downside Risk",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2cdeed70-06ee-438d-859a-227bc74e4020",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "executive-summary",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d11f73fa-75f3-42c4-9a0e-babadfdeb117",
      "evidence": "The slide provides a high-level summary of the investment thesis.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 76,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "5c97492b-d3b4-46d9-8bf6-e685ece94ea2",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Cite Precedent",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Spruce Point cites its track record and various precedents to support its claims.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 123,
      "from": 1,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "96af0651-6de6-4b30-ba3b-77cee8001437",
      "evidence": "The loop is implicit, as the document builds a case for selling MSCI shares.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction for investors not selling MSCI shares",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}