{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8",
  "docSlug": "9250edf61831",
  "documentTitle": "MSCI Inc. (MSCI)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2024-01-17 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 123,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The slide uses a sidebar-body layout common in activist presentations to summarize key arguments.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-781d6376c0a8#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "By conducting a realistic sum-of-parts valuation of MSCI's business segments, we estimate 55% - 65% downside risk ($190 - $244 per share) and expect MSCI to underperform the S&P 500 and its own relevant benchmark indices.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-1ac4-74a6-be20-16492b5eccc9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "MSCI's Fundamental Owners Are Selling; Heavily Promoted By Morgan Stanley; Limited / No Upside To Consensus Price Targets; Easy To Dismiss The Bull Case; Extreme Valuation Premium Makes MSCI An Underweight With 55%-65% Downside Risk",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c405b0f3-ce72-4217-b362-12bac14a84d5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "downside risk: 55% - 65%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-1ac4-74a6-be20-1a4d25ee51bd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "We see a poor risk / reward in owning MSCI's shares. The average sell-side broker consensus price target is $554/share, representing just 2.6% upside. We believe there is a certain comedic humor in MSCI's ratings and price targets. Notably, one of the highest Street price targets is from Morgan Stanley, who recently upgraded the stock calling it a \"Top Pick\". As previously mentioned, MSCI was founded as Morgan Stanley Capital International with Morgan Stanley incubating the business and leading its IPO as underwriter in 2007. As such, we believe Morgan Stanley is the most biased stock promoter. Ironically, Morningstar, which is a key competitor to MSCI, has a Sell recommendation and Street-low $440/share price target. While also biased, we believe their rationale to sell the stock far outweighs the merits from the upside case promoted by Morgan Stanley.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3d89ac85-b4c0-401c-8f0c-51c6bfc3aac1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.67
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Spruce Point believes the current sell-side promoters need to refresh their thinking about MSCI and the sustainability of its growth and margins, especially \"faster growth\" segment areas in ESG and Climate and Private Assets. We believe it is easy to dismiss much of the bull case narrative with some simple channel checks, a close forensic review of MSCI's financials and by speaking with former employees. Specifically, we believe analysts and investors need to rethink the sustainability of MSCI's high client Retention Rate in a changing competitive landscape as well as its capital allocation policies. We believe management is showing poor discipline with acquisitions, while deploying too much capital to share repurchases with its stock trading at an industry-high multiple of 17x and 29x 2024E revenue and Adj. EBITDA. Investors would be better served with a higher dividend rather than allowing management to essentially buy its way towards handsome long-term bonuses tied to Adj. EPS. MSCI's leverage is now at a decade high at approximately 3x Net Debt / EBITDA which we believe is at the worst time as client Retention Rates decline. By conducting a realistic sum-of-parts valuation of MSCI's business segments, we estimate 55% - 65% downside risk ($190 - $244 per share) and expect MSCI to underperform the S&P 500 and its own relevant benchmark indices.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "437990e8-01c1-4983-9a36-d862a67cdcd9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Spruce Point believes the fundamental case against owning MSCI is mirrored by movements among its largest institutional owners. Fidelity and T.Rowe Price were formerly >5% owners but have repeatedly reduced their ownership in the Company. Furthermore, consistent with our view of weakening governance measures, we find that Director ownership has noticeably declined in the past few years.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5739a857-bf94-4729-a4e7-87aa372d129e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Spruce Point Sees 55% - 65% Downside Risk In MSCI's Share Price",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "93b5536b-2717-4a24-9d55-e235028ca27a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 123,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "d662b123-aabd-40a9-9b1e-07f3af79864c",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Expose Contradiction",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Most slides aim to reveal contradictions or issues with MSCI's reporting, strategy, or performance.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 76,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "5c97492b-d3b4-46d9-8bf6-e685ece94ea2",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Cite Precedent",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Spruce Point cites its track record and various precedents to support its claims.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 123,
      "from": 1,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "96af0651-6de6-4b30-ba3b-77cee8001437",
      "evidence": "The loop is implicit, as the document builds a case for selling MSCI shares.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction for investors not selling MSCI shares",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}