{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-09b0063ec30e",
  "docSlug": "f01a5a9839a9",
  "documentTitle": "Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Ben Axler",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2021-02-16 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 77,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "precedent_table",
  "function": "cite_precedent",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 'precedent_table' structure to establish credibility by highlighting past successful short-selling or activist campaigns.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-09b0063ec30e/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-09b0063ec30e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-09b0063ec30e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-09b0063ec30e#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Early indicators of sales and earnings revisions can be identified with a careful forensic review.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-64cd-733b-aca1-a53f6d71816f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Early indicators of sales and earnings revisions can be identified with a careful forensic review. We believe Leidos (NYSE: LDOS) is at high risk of major disappointment given business and accounting strains we will highlight.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "63bb97ca-5aba-45c4-86ad-6b6dc51a14f8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.97
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "The recommendations shown above are not intended to be exhaustive. A full list of all recommendations made over the past twelve months can be found on our website",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "88578dc5-0659-400a-a778-1a5c51bee600",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.68,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of Maxar, Mercury Systems, and Forescout Technologies across Company, Exchange, Report Date, Criticisms, and Outcome.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1367ea2a-9d3c-44ac-917d-ee5af2ec4b94",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.32,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Spruce Point's Successful Forensic Accounting Warnings In Government Service Providers Before Major Share Price Revisions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3145ebb4-fb83-46de-8c86-054eba3cee7e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Valuation: Precedent transactions",
      "slug": "precedent-transactions",
      "agent": "architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "7b076600-582d-462e-9f31-9c43c5dfda68",
      "evidence": "Comparison table of Maxar, Mercury Systems, and Forescout Technologies across Company, Exchange, Report Date, Criticisms, and Outcome.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "authority-citation",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "89fddc08-da75-436a-b1a8-55acfec8d9e2",
      "evidence": "Citing past successful predictions to build credibility for current thesis.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 1,
      "beatId": "e4014cc9-3a89-4633-8af8-47f31b8185d6",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
      "evidence": "The document identifies various problems with Leidos' financials and business practices.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}