{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-dbf69e8285f9",
  "docSlug": "c97bc876ffb7",
  "documentTitle": "LHC Group, Inc. (LHCG)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2020-01-15 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 41,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "Uses a classic 'Street vs. Reality' comparison framework common in activist short reports.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-dbf69e8285f9/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-dbf69e8285f9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-dbf69e8285f9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-dbf69e8285f9#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Excluding AFAM locations allows management to report high single-digit organic growth, which would otherwise be below 2%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b66-7100-895a-0e1e56c2f11d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "A close forensic investigation of LHCG's underlying organic growth and true profitability profile leads us to have a far more bearish view on the Company than the bullish industry consensus, which remains blind to major issues with its performance, strategy, and management team.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "06294ecc-8b2e-442b-a4a1-80fe4e66924a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.72,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table with columns: Topic, Favorable Street Perception of LHCG, Spruce Point Reality Opinion",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "465612bc-2663-499d-bea6-1a0394a6f336",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.67,
        "x": 0.31,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Naïve LHCG Bull Case vs. Spruce Point Findings",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a5a2a578-0846-4c1c-ac41-cc471210f2e9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3535f1e4-9e64-48af-92ea-e295337cda9a",
      "evidence": "Table structure contrasting two opposing viewpoints",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "fd3b248a-a2c9-4c8f-ad75-dd70d7495a52",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
      "evidence": "The executive summary and short LHCG thesis outline the problem.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 41,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "100ad489-dbf4-43de-8e22-48ed5d7f68fc",
      "evidence": "The deck implies that investors will suffer financial losses if they do not heed Spruce Point's warning.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "The cost of inaction for investors who fail to recognize LHCG's true financial performance.",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}