{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c99fec0ed8aa",
  "docSlug": "1c836eeb374c",
  "documentTitle": "Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Ben Axler",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2019-10-09 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 56,
  "pageCount": 95,
  "prevPage": 55,
  "nextPage": 57,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 36,
  "notes": "The slide uses sarcasm to imply that Monolithic's consistent performance is suspicious or manipulated.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c99fec0ed8aa/56",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c99fec0ed8aa",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c99fec0ed8aa.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-c99fec0ed8aa#slide-56",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.195
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Monolithic's ability to rarely disappoint on sales and earnings in its industry is amazing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5e11a54c-03b5-48bd-ae06-64589c6895c4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Quarterly Sales Misses: 1",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-ee38-728b-98cc-f7f59a4f3512",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.96
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Bloomberg SURP function",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3bbbe6ad-1c7d-4850-ab1b-2195d9f20010",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of quarterly sales and EPS misses for Monolithic Power vs peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c4989127-b232-440f-b5e1-fa14c94d0451",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.305,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Monolithic's Extraordinary Ability To Never Disappoint Analysts",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ceef40b0-1f13-4388-b69e-29f5031e0947",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "97c6e843-1156-4833-83e8-4987abe04317",
      "evidence": "Compares Monolithic Power against a peer group of semiconductor companies across four metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 95,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "7f502b1a-d13a-4cdb-a619-66898178d5f2",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "The document finally presents a solution, estimating 75-85% downside risk and providing a detailed valuation analysis.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}