{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b531f2b0553d",
  "docSlug": "c54d9b8bb206",
  "documentTitle": "Verint Systems, Inc. (VRNT)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2019-05-23 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 75,
  "pageCount": 108,
  "prevPage": 74,
  "nextPage": 76,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 40,
  "notes": "The slide uses a combination of tables and a bar chart to contrast compensation, operational efficiency, and stock performance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table",
    "bar_chart_grouped"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b531f2b0553d/75",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b531f2b0553d",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b531f2b0553d.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-b531f2b0553d#slide-75",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Although NICE is larger than Verint on most metrics (revenue, EBITDA, EBIT) and more efficient (revenue per employee, EBIT per employee), average compensation per insider at Verint is over 3x that at NICE, and Verint insiders take home a far greater percentage of EBIT in compensation than do NICE insiders.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b65-734e-a974-8726aed6ce5e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.68
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Stock Performance: VRNT vs. NICE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b0d66139-71b4-4800-b5ea-b12e34e9b702",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Average Compensation per Insider: $1.6",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b65-734e-a974-8a5b6c4b5cc1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Although NICE is larger than Verint on most metrics (revenue, EBITDA, EBIT) and more efficient (revenue per employee, EBIT per employee), average compensation per insider at Verint is over 3x that at NICE, and Verint insiders take home a far greater percentage of EBIT in compensation than do NICE insiders. This despite the fact that NICE shares have outperformed VRNT shares by a substantial margin through the past several years.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5d10f233-6059-4f12-9675-d0f0586445db",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.48,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Executive compensation breakdown for Verint and NICE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "441d43af-904c-4ef3-938f-e15c57d0ad33",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.46,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Operational metrics comparison for Verint and NICE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc01fd7c-3d92-4b90-95c2-27198cd4bed7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.31,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Executive Compensation Far Out Of Line With Its Closest Peer",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d58a019e-2067-4bf5-bcaf-47c24a09aa76",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "df0231dc-e8d8-418e-b6cc-28f6fedac944",
      "evidence": "The slide includes a 'peer gap chart' with a table/data comparing operational metrics and a chart/bar-grouped showing stock performance.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9e0dab4b-dfe1-4362-b849-98a8391ccc05",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of two companies across multiple metrics to highlight discrepancy.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}