{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c",
  "docSlug": "778e2cbfbfaa",
  "documentTitle": "Amdocs Limited (DOX)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Ben Axler",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2019-01-23 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 128,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 'Yes' column to emphasize the repetition of negative patterns.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The fact that we have seen the same management team behave in a similar manner in response to similarly negative industry trends – all leading up to a dramatic guidance revision after executives enriched themselves during the Dot com boom/bust – makes us worried that current investors in DOX are headed for a similar fate as those who were left to sue for securities fraud in 2002.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0f1e-7015-901e-a6ac1cbdc053",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Comparison of historical vs current management behavior",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "74351d74-cba5-45b0-b346-ed812d47804a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The fact that we have seen the same management team behave in a similar manner in response to similarly negative industry trends – all leading up to a dramatic guidance revision after executives enriched themselves during the Dot com boom/bust – makes us worried that current investors in DOX are headed for a similar fate as those who were left to sue for securities fraud in 2002. As management appears to run out of accounting levers to pull, and as its capacity for continued growth through M&A becomes strained, it becomes more and more likely that the story being spun by the Company will crack. Worryingly, we now observe evidence of new behavior perhaps even more egregious than anything carried out by management during the dot com bust, potentially magnifying the risks to which current DOX investors are exposed.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ec3d78ab-97dc-481e-9cfa-d087b11485c5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of 2002 vs Today across three categories: Secretive Control, Insider Selling, and Same Actors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e57ec7f9-e3b3-40da-9206-15883e4e83f4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.31,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Reviving The Post-Dot Com Bust Playbook: Is Amdocs Pulling The Same Levers To Hide Weakness? (Continued)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "87ff90ec-4e69-4517-8455-6126aaa386e0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "275b7a35-161f-4317-9b1b-866940b2c032",
      "evidence": "Table structure comparing 2002 observations with current day status.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "8308d5f2-daed-464d-9e71-01ddb2f05f0c",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Complication",
      "beatSlug": "complication",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a series of accounting discrepancies and financial performance concerns",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}