{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c",
  "docSlug": "778e2cbfbfaa",
  "documentTitle": "Amdocs Limited (DOX)",
  "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
  "authorName": "Ben Axler",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2019-01-23 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 128,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 'Have We Seen This Before?' column to reinforce the pattern recognition argument.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-9727cc72301c#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Amdocs appears to be engaging in the same behavior today as was described in the 2002 lawsuit – and, with turnover at Amdocs relatively low at the top, these practices are being put into place by many of the same executives and directors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0f1e-7015-9020-37c7e53765dc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "After a downward sales guidance revision of 40% drove the price of DOX shares down 40% in 2002, investors filed a class action lawsuit accusing management of hiding underlying business weakness in the wake of the dot com bust. In our opinion, as the telecom industry faces major headwinds once again, we observe that Amdocs appears to be engaging in the same behavior today as was described in the 2002 lawsuit – and, with turnover at Amdocs relatively low at the top, these practices are being put into place by many of the same executives and directors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ca7b6b15-fd15-4a3e-91f1-93107032e6b9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.58,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of 2002 vs Today across four categories: Industry Headwinds, Serial Acquisitions, Workforce Growth, and Accounting.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d19da2d3-b10f-4303-8dab-c62cb5ea02b1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Reviving The Post-Dot Com Bust Playbook: Is Amdocs Pulling The Same Levers To Hide Weakness?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a0b84586-8fce-4ccc-bea6-75bb830a7eee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "expose_contradiction",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8ba06095-896e-42e4-9f08-c523014cbd20",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of past lawsuit allegations vs current company behavior to imply recurring fraud.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "8308d5f2-daed-464d-9e71-01ddb2f05f0c",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Complication",
      "beatSlug": "complication",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a series of accounting discrepancies and financial performance concerns",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}