{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-3dbc63d0ef7f",
  "docSlug": "be3fcb7ce6bf",
  "documentTitle": "ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)",
  "authorId": "53_Kerrisdale_Capital",
  "authorName": "Kerrisdale Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
  "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2025-01-29 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 25,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 24,
  "nextPage": 26,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 160,
  "notes": "The table segments companies into Small Cap WFE, Large Cap WFE, Japanese WFE, and Chinese WFE, with ACMR at the bottom.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-3dbc63d0ef7f/25",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-3dbc63d0ef7f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-3dbc63d0ef7f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-3dbc63d0ef7f#slide-25",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "A simple re-rating of ACMR to its direct comparables set - other Chinese WFE national champions that will continue to be directed revenue by Chinese semiconductor customers for many years to come as the country aggressively builds out its homegrown industry - implies multi-bagger returns for ACMR shareholders.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b61-7647-86fc-1400da7caa2c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EV/Rev: 1.1x",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-2b61-7647-86fc-1950d664b3a8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.135,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.745
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Our large-cap WFE comparables set of Applied Materials, Lam Research, and KLA trades at median revenue and P/E multiples of 5x and 20x, respectively... Applying the 5x revenue multiple of these large-caps implies over 300% returns for ACMR shareholders.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9c21a2fd-a00b-46b5-a33a-ddc8e02562ad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.115,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.605
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Arguably the most direct comparable companies are the Chinese WFE players... A simple re-rating of ACMR to its direct comparables set... implies multi-bagger returns for ACMR shareholders.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e861e799-c2aa-46c5-8940-35c772a3a322",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.011,
        "w": 0.105,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.573
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: S&P Capital IQ",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1496a004-ca5e-4f61-b3d9-544ad255c040",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.405,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.158
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparable company valuation metrics including Stock Price, 1-Year Return, Market Cap, Revenue, EBITDA Margin, YoY Rev Growth, and 2025E Multiples.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "33ed3a61-73b7-4508-aa89-4245c4e27819",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.011,
        "w": 0.198,
        "x": 0.401,
        "y": 0.146
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "ACMR Comparable Company Analysis ($M)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "daa2a7b2-e34d-4d2d-8d53-a299e90b7a4f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "1dfbb379-4406-4b74-be60-da82e9c1b5fe",
      "evidence": "Although not explicitly a 2x2 matrix, the comparison of valuation metrics implies a matrix-like structure.",
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3efa8e51-355d-467c-b787-fc3d540cd663",
      "evidence": "The slide compares ACMR to its peers using a table of valuation metrics, including EV/Rev and P/E multiples.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "2c3410a7-8ab0-4fcd-8f1d-50dab1a6a191",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a peer group analysis to establish valuation benchmarks.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 27,
      "from": 16,
      "beatId": "7fc4dd0f-0fab-4865-bc60-52ab1be5f86a",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear solution, highlighting ACMR's growth drivers and investment potential",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "338f88bd-c79d-4168-ad70-eb5456f1f244",
      "evidence": "The document highlights the potential risks of not investing in ACMR, including missed growth opportunities",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What is the cost of not investing in ACMR?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 27,
      "from": 24,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "693cb2dc-2e51-4d89-b6e6-cdb0a776135e",
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear investment thesis with a potential multi-bagger upside",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "What is the potential upside of investing in ACMR?",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}