{
  "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-ec98cd6eb9db",
  "docSlug": "2858ba557a99",
  "documentTitle": "Burford Capital (BUR)",
  "authorId": "51_Muddy_Waters",
  "authorName": "Carson C. Block",
  "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
  "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
  "presentationDate": "2019-08-27 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 12,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "appendix",
  "function": "appendix",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Court filing page 2 of 5, Case 2:14-cv-02592-CCC-JBC.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-ec98cd6eb9db/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-ec98cd6eb9db",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-ec98cd6eb9db.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-ec98cd6eb9db#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "5. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9 because the parties agreed that judgment upon the award rendered may be entered by either Party in any court that has jurisdiction over the Parties or the subject matter of the controversy or claim.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1e633525-9e13-434c-ad29-bbf5a0e18290",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "6. Glenmark and Napo are parties to a Collaboration Agreement dated July 2, 2005, as amended (“Collaboration Agreement”). Exhibit 1, Jay Cert. at 3.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2444451d-2226-4f97-9489-57157b3439b7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.49
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Glenmark’s Demand for Arbitration sought declarations of certain of the parties rights under the Collaboration Agreement, including (1) that Glenmark had the exclusive rights to use, market, sell, offer for sale, and import Licensed Product(s)...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "36aab0ab-7eb7-4a84-80ff-13f615349f2d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.4
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "7. On August 4, 2011, Glenmark submitted a Demand for Arbitration to the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (“ICDR”) against Napo captioned Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ICDR No. 50 122 T 00512 11 (the “Arbitration”).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5e5b1875-49ac-43c8-9be3-2ba463064741",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Case 2:14-cv-02592-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID: 2",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "65c9ec70-c032-47f7-8015-0043228bbb2a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.76,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.82
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "8. On September 9, 2011, Napo submitted an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim for Breach of Contract in the Arbitration (“Counterclaim”). Napo’s Counterclaim",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "db4163ca-e643-4015-8f17-2daa6e8db4aa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "Glenmark and Napo are parties to a Collaboration Agreement dated July 2, 2005, as amended (\"Collaboration Agreement\").",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-ee3d-779f-824f-64d23f1e7bb1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.17,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Procedural History Of The Arbitration",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e0b63662-4150-42c6-834d-328d8b1bb9cd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}