{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-256464d6609c",
  "docSlug": "2723e45b96d8",
  "documentTitle": "Keisei Electric Railway (9009)",
  "authorId": "24_Palliser_Capital",
  "authorName": "Palliser",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2025-04-23 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414603,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 55,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "peer_gap",
  "function": "expose_gap",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 20,
  "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to highlight consistent underperformance in both profitability and asset efficiency.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "line_chart",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-256464d6609c/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-256464d6609c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-256464d6609c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-256464d6609c#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Consistently lowest transportation segment operating profit margin vs. peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-ee3d-779f-824a-2380c1b36e72",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Transportation Segment Operating Profit Margin",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "387c311f-c7a3-4f3d-9562-c362bda798b7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Transportation Segment ROA",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e65754ba-d2b8-4af1-bdaa-10c5684e4106",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "operating profit margin",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-ee3d-779f-824a-25ff0e107b38",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Company filings, Bloomberg. Note: ROA is defined as Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) / Average Assets.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dfd2ca9b-e95d-4295-a296-2a421285fdb6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "...and a transportation segment consistently underperforming its peers...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dd3a3a28-1125-42fa-b332-343ea7499e9f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "e2b00c72-81c7-4095-b8cb-fdbde5c7a918",
      "evidence": "The slide compares Keisei's transportation segment operating profit margin to its peers.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "153499d3-3858-4dc9-98a2-5f00f5af5249",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of company performance against peer average over time.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 27,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "e6f87b11-5c8c-4da0-b2a0-6319849fb852",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck agitates the problems, highlighting the consequences of inaction and poor governance",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 35,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "f0940240-d9b8-41ff-9bcc-f5c4d2ba5d00",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of inaction, including persistent underperformance and undervaluation",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To highlight the cost of inaction and motivate investors and board to take urgent action",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}