{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a",
  "docSlug": "38055c6246e1",
  "documentTitle": "BP plc (BP)",
  "authorId": "23_Bluebell_Capital",
  "authorName": "Giuseppe Bivona and Marco Taricco",
  "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
  "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-04-18 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.7074423,
  "pageNumber": 34,
  "pageCount": 43,
  "prevPage": 33,
  "nextPage": 35,
  "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "This is a page from a legal/shareholder document (Bluebell Capital Partners) outlining a specific argument ('The Harwood Argument') regarding planning permission compliance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "numbered_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a/34",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a#slide-34",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The failure to have regard to this obviously material consideration vitiated the Planning Permission, which",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-f5d4-752d-aadb-a78f57e52331",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.704,
        "x": 0.148,
        "y": 0.165
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "72. The Planning Permission, correctly interpreted, required “strict accordance” with Approved Plans PDL-08 and PNL-6839. That means 110,640 panels... 73. Two things follow from this... 74. The second of these was a material consideration...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a6447af3-d837-426f-9477-7f9d49ef76fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.035,
        "w": 0.704,
        "x": 0.148,
        "y": 0.085
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Mr Harwood KC answers “yes” to both of these questions. Here is the essence, as I saw it, of the Harwood Argument on this part of the case:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a3f04319-b94c-4cb6-b251-a47aa8866cf5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "The Planning Permission, correctly interpreted, required “strict accordance” with Approved Plans PDL-08 and PNL-6839. — Mr Harwood KC",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-f5d4-752d-aadb-aaac7783c699",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.015,
        "w": 0.205,
        "x": 0.148,
        "y": 0.135
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The Harwood Argument",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9f0675bb-9263-48a3-82a4-c69d38e86412",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "antagonist-introduction",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4f9682b1-ebc6-4ae7-8803-e588323c136c",
      "evidence": "The slide frames the developer's failure as a material oversight.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "fc18fef9-62e5-405f-9ec2-7b3c91f3cc6f",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document concludes by discussing the implications of the objections and the company's position.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 21,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "579f9dcb-b4fb-4497-b71f-3ffe88fb7203",
      "evidence": "The document discusses the implications of the objections and the company's position.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "What are the implications of not addressing the concerns and objections?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}