{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a",
  "docSlug": "38055c6246e1",
  "documentTitle": "BP plc (BP)",
  "authorId": "23_Bluebell_Capital",
  "authorName": "Giuseppe Bivona and Marco Taricco",
  "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
  "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-04-18 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.7074423,
  "pageNumber": 33,
  "pageCount": 43,
  "prevPage": 32,
  "nextPage": 34,
  "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 5,
  "notes": "This is a page from a legal/shareholder letter document detailing a challenge to a solar farm planning permission.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "numbered_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a/33",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-edd4b4264c1a#slide-33",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The Defendant failed to take into account a material consideration, namely, that it was approving more panels over a larger area than were required to produce the stated (and a lawful) electricity generating capacity.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-fb8f-761b-afc4-0a026087d47c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.73
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Agreed Issue [AI.2]: Whether the planning permission, correctly interpreted, approved such a very large number and area of solar panels that they could only have a capacity under 50MW...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "df33aac1-52b8-4704-9c98-c51f288c11a6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Again, suppose I had found: (a) that Approved Plan PNL-6839 incorporates the Trina 685 Wp; (b) that the Combined-Panels Method is the objectively correct interpretation... of 'capacity' in the Statutory Capacity Threshold...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "023e9ab7-9574-44a0-ad9d-c30207db0fce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "I return to the interpretive premise. The November 2023 Officer Report told the NMA decision-maker... that this new provision 'is commensurate with the details in the planning application...'",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5dd94ba4-1b4d-4d7d-addf-616f0350c05d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The fourth aspect of the NMA was the inclusion of this new provision, at the end of Planning Condition 4: The approved development, once operational, shall have an export capacity of not more than 49.9MW (AC).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a2b15e90-c866-48e4-93bc-e7076a3aa331",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "The approved development, once operational, shall have an export capacity of not more than 49.9MW (AC). — Planning Condition 4",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-fb8f-761b-afc4-0cef05dee068",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.66
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Line of Challenge 2: The Question of Underpowered-Panels/Oversized-Footprint",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8baed3c7-0c4b-4f6b-bd06-3c7ad40571a7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "NMA #4: Capped Export Capacity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ad23d7e3-4705-457d-a73f-96a35314044c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "fraud-exposure",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "de160351-fb20-44cb-b278-681244ccb0b0",
      "evidence": "The text argues that the NMA was a 'purported' amendment 'vitiated by the misdirection in law'.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "fc18fef9-62e5-405f-9ec2-7b3c91f3cc6f",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document concludes by discussing the implications of the objections and the company's position.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 21,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "579f9dcb-b4fb-4497-b71f-3ffe88fb7203",
      "evidence": "The document discusses the implications of the objections and the company's position.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "What are the implications of not addressing the concerns and objections?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}