{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81",
  "docSlug": "b21885cc5252",
  "documentTitle": "BP plc (BP)",
  "authorId": "23_Bluebell_Capital",
  "authorName": "Giuseppe Bivona & Marco Taricco",
  "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
  "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-05-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.7074423,
  "pageNumber": 35,
  "pageCount": 49,
  "prevPage": 34,
  "nextPage": 36,
  "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": "This is a page from a legal-style shareholder letter or activist investor report.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.9,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81/35",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81#slide-35",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The Court can rule on whether a generating station exceeds the Statutory Capacity Threshold so that development consent was needed.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-25b5-768c-bb39-fdeb6e505c10",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "60. On analysis, the Harwood Argument on this part of the case has a triple-premise. For the argument to get off the ground, three things must all be correct. (1) One is that “capacity” in the Statutory Capacity Threshold necessarily means as measured by the Combined-Panels Method. (2) Another is that the legally correct interpretation of Planning Conditions 4 and 12 is that development in “strict accordance” with Approved Panels PDL-08 and PNL-6839 permits no divergence at the Condition 12 details-approval stage. (3) Another is that Trina 685 Wp solar panels are incorporated as part of Approved Plan PNL-6839.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "44f9a24b-19a3-458c-a351-101b08166198",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "[A1.3] Whether the planning permission is unlawful because: [A1.3a] The Defendant approved a scheme which cannot be authorized by planning permission; [A1.3b] The Defendant approved a scheme which is incapable of being built out in full, as a matter of law; ...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5944523d-7742-40c1-b4e0-aaaed082533c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "61. Here is the essence of the Harwood Argument on this part of the case, as I saw it. (1) PNL-6839 is an Approved Plan which had been submitted “electronically”... (2) The digital file name for the pdf of Approved Plan PNL-6839 includes “Trina 685 Wp”... (3) Trina 685 Wp is the commercially available solar panel whose dimensions (2384mm x 1303mm) precisely match PNL-6839... Mr Galloway’s Panel-Count and Capacity-Count shows that 110,640 of the Trina 685 Wp panels (each with its maximum power output of 685W) gives an aggregate of 75.78MW... (4) It follows that the Council has purported to grant planning permission for a generating station which cannot in law be authorised by planning permission...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "be41670d-10f4-4035-b30e-68c3e60fd566",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "Mr Harwood KC, for Mr Galloway, answers “yes” to all three questions. — Mr Harwood KC",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-25b5-768c-bb3a-03f744611aa7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.58,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "BLUEBELL CAPITAL PARTNERS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d2f24657-86c6-4ece-a575-a7c0543f1047",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "logical-chain",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f2d01035-0a5a-443d-9a0c-2aa51d8851db",
      "evidence": "The text explicitly outlines a 'triple-premise' argument and a numbered sequence of logical deductions.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}