{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81",
  "docSlug": "b21885cc5252",
  "documentTitle": "BP plc (BP)",
  "authorId": "23_Bluebell_Capital",
  "authorName": "Giuseppe Bivona & Marco Taricco",
  "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
  "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-05-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.7074423,
  "pageNumber": 26,
  "pageCount": 49,
  "prevPage": 25,
  "nextPage": 27,
  "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "This is a page from a legal/shareholder letter document, specifically focusing on the interpretation of planning conditions.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.9,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81/26",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81#slide-26",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Planning Condition 4, correctly interpreted, is not requiring rigid adherence with Approved Plans such as PDL-08 and PNL-6839.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-25b5-768c-bb39-aa88499701a0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.62,
        "x": 0.19,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "39. The first feature of the Planning Permission, which has this effect, is the wording on the face of the Approved Plans themselves. The phrase 'strict accordance' needs to be interpreted in the light of the very plans which are 'the approved plans'.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "50622fa3-d460-4a83-acb6-0cd579401315",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.62,
        "x": 0.19,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "40. The second feature of the Planning Permission, which has this effect, is the Design and Access Statement. This Statement was one of the supporting",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a4b0a695-7982-445b-958c-a60eeb49ccc6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.62,
        "x": 0.19,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "38. Planning Condition 4, correctly interpreted, is not requiring rigid adherence with Approved Plans such as PDL-08 and PNL-6839. This is supported by the particular context; and by common sense.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fce87c73-6f03-4aee-9e16-fd72b0c94c43",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.58,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "BLUEBELL CAPITAL PARTNERS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3f7e506e-cbc1-44a3-9b16-79e44a42b832",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "argument-from-analogy",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "48d1809d-992b-45c3-9871-2cfb67f43af1",
      "evidence": "Uses the solar panel technology change example to argue against rigid adherence to plans.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}