{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81",
  "docSlug": "b21885cc5252",
  "documentTitle": "BP plc (BP)",
  "authorId": "23_Bluebell_Capital",
  "authorName": "Giuseppe Bivona & Marco Taricco",
  "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
  "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-05-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.7074423,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 49,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal document or shareholder letter discussing a specific judicial review case.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.9,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-eb7244bd6d81#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "[AI.1] through [AI.4] outlining specific legal questions regarding planning permission and non-material amendments.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9fd60e6c-2108-4bd6-a37e-19edc98bd5ce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "8. The ventilation of Agreed Issue [A1.4c] attracted resistance from the Council and the Developer. They characterised it as inappropriate ‘rolling judicial review’. But this resistance subsided...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7f5e5dbb-4c18-4f68-8316-69644a28582f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "On analysis, Mr Galloway’s claim for judicial review really boils down to two key lines of challenge (§§59, 71 below). Before getting to them, I have a lot of ground to cover.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "878cb4e8-a974-4c1a-adcb-13f22c4a1835",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "The ventilation of Agreed Issue [A1.4c] attracted resistance from the Council and the Developer. They characterised it as inappropriate ‘rolling judicial review’. But this resistance subsided.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-25b5-768c-bb38-791c410e12bd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.58,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "BLUEBELL CAPITAL PARTNERS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "eb162888-2659-48f7-a4d4-a89773571317",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.41
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "‘Rolling judicial review’",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6fdbc767-9eaa-4e73-9b5f-34e9881a2372",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 12,
      "name": "Expert Witness",
      "slug": "23-expert-witness",
      "bestFor": "Technical validation, regulatory compliance, skeptical executives",
      "matchId": "81820c0e-7b66-449c-81e1-e2fe46322475",
      "evidence": "Slides 12-24 include citations of approved judgments and expert discussions.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To provide evidence and expert opinions",
      "structure": "The Authority's Credentials -> Their Finding/Opinion -> Applied to Our Case",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Borrow credibility from a recognized authority to validate your position"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}