{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c",
  "docSlug": "3544dfcc3316",
  "documentTitle": "Viacom (VIAB)",
  "authorId": "18_SpringOwl",
  "authorName": "Eric Jackson",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2016-01-13 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 13,
  "pageCount": 99,
  "prevPage": 12,
  "nextPage": 14,
  "slideType": "villain_critique",
  "function": "name_villain",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The slide uses a two-section structure to attack the board and the Chair separately.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "subtitle_text",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c/13",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c#slide-13",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Outside Directors are Among the Highest Paid in the Media Sector, Perhaps Explaining their Generosity Towards Viacom's CEO and COO",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-f5d3-71df-9936-93577e02e2b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The Viacom Board Is Too Large, Too Cozy, and Too Overpaid For Under Performance. Viacom’s Board of 11 is Among the Largest in the Media Sector. Deborah Norville is Classified as Independent. Almost 75% of the Board Should be Not Independent.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5d4876b1-1c02-4c6d-932d-805badd08a6b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.57
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Sumner Redstone is an Absent Chair. It’s No Way To Run a Board. Lack of Clarity Around Succession Plans. Absence From Earnings Calls Exacerbates Discount. A New Chair May Help Remove the Heavy Discount.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b6a97b1f-2de1-406a-97e2-267d817d9b03",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Viacom Management Has Under Performed for Years With No Accountability",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "227616f2-a000-4f53-a9a5-1c86a151818e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "antagonist-introduction",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "dea8a9fe-0590-44fc-aaf1-266329a55f89",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly names the board and Sumner Redstone as the source of underperformance and lack of accountability.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "3fbc1753-34ff-47c1-96df-2b6cd8783239",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck then agitates the problems, highlighting the consequences of inaction and the failures of Viacom's management and board.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "9800239c-ef65-41e3-b47f-b85209756f23",
      "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the consequences of not taking action to address Viacom's decline.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To highlight the costs of inaction and the need for change",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}